Recursive Transformer: Boosting Reasoning Ability with State Stack
Kechi Zhang, Ge Li, Jia Li, Huangzhao Zhang, Yihong Dong, Jia Li, Jingjing Xu, Zhi Jin
Abstract
The Transformer architecture has emerged as a landmark advancement within the broad field of artificial intelligence, effectively catalyzing the advent of large language models (LLMs). However, despite its remarkable capabilities and the substantial progress it has facilitated, the Transformer architecture still has some limitations. One such intrinsic limitation is its inability to effectively recognize regular expressions or deterministic context-free grammars. Standard Transformers lack an explicit mechanism for recursion and structured state transitions, which can hinder systematic generalization on nested and hierarchical patterns. Drawing inspiration from pushdown automata, which efficiently resolve deterministic context-free grammars using stacks, we equip layers with a differentiable stack and propose S TACK T RANS with recursion to address the aforementioned issue within LLMs. Unlike previous approaches that modify the attention computation, S TACK - T RANS explicitly incorporates hidden state stacks between Transformer layers. This design maintains compatibility with existing frameworks like flash-attention. Specifically, our design features stack operations – such as pushing and popping hidden states – that are differentiable and can be learned in an end-to-end manner. Our comprehensive evaluation spans benchmarks for both Chomsky hierarchy and large-scale natural languages. Across these diverse tasks, S TACK T RANS consistently outperforms standard Transformer models and other baselines. We have successfully scaled S TACK T RANS up from 360M to 7B parameters. In particular, our from-scratch pretrained model S TACK T RANS -360M outperforms several larger open-source LLMs with 2–3 × more parameters, showcasing its superior efficiency and reasoning capability
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-AwarenessTri Dao, Daniel Y. Fu, Stefano Ermon, Atri Rudra et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 5,493 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
Related papers
- Stack Attention: Improving the Ability of Transformers to Model Hierarchical PatternsBrian DuSell, David ChiangICLR 2024 · 15 citations
- Pushdown Layers: Encoding Recursive Structure in Transformer Language ModelsShikhar Murty, Pratyusha Sharma, Jacob Andreas, Christopher D. ManningEMNLP 2023
- Learning Hierarchical Structures with Differentiable Nondeterministic StacksBrian DuSell, David ChiangICLR 2022 · 19 citations
- Learning Bounded Context-Free-Grammar via LSTM and the Transformer: Difference and the ExplanationsHui Shi, Sicun Gao, Yuandong Tian, Xinyun Chen et al.AAAI 2022 · 24 citations
- The Expressive Capacity of State Space Models: A Formal Language PerspectiveYash Raj Sarrof, Yana Veitsman, Michael HahnNeurIPS 2024 · 53 citations
