Fair and Efficient Allocations under Subadditive Valuations
Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Jugal Garg, Ruta Mehta
Abstract
We study the problem of allocating a set of indivisible goods among agents with subadditive valuations in a fair and efficient manner. Envy-Freeness up to any good (EFX) is the most compelling notion of fairness in the context of indivisible goods. Although the existence of EFX is not known beyond the simple case of two agents with subadditive valuations, some good approximations of EFX are known to exist, namely 1 2 -EFX allocation [PR18] and EFX allocations with bounded charity [CKMS20]. Nash welfare (the geometric mean of agents' valuations) is one of the most commonly used measures of efficiency. In case of additive valuations, an allocation that maximizes Nash welfare also satisfies fairness properties like Envy-Free up to one good (EF1). Although there is substantial work on approximating Nash welfare when agents have additive valuations, very little is known when agents have subadditive valuations. In this paper, we design a polynomial-time algorithm that outputs an allocation that satisfies either of the two approximations of EFX as well as achieves an O(n) approximation to the Nash welfare. Our result also improves the current best-known approximation of O(n log n) [GKK20] and O(m) [NR14] to Nash welfare when agents have submodular and subadditive valuations, respectively. Furthermore, our technique also gives an O(n) approximation to a family of welfare measures, p-mean of valuations for p ∈ (-∞, 1], thereby also matching asymptotically the current best approximation ratio for special cases like p = -∞ [KP07] while also retaining the remarkable fairness properties.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 03ffbb34-5aa2-4f63-a4fd-d407a53e09c5Cited by top-tier papers12
- Fair and Efficient Allocations Without Obvious ManipulationsAlexandros Psomas, Paritosh VermaNeurIPS 2022 · 37 citations
- Maximizing Nash Social Welfare in 2-Value InstancesHannaneh Akrami, Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Martin Hoefer, Kurt Mehlhorn et al.AAAI 2022 · 31 citations
- Almost Envy-freeness, Envy-rank, and Nash Social Welfare MatchingsAlireza Farhadi, Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi, Mohamad Latifian, Masoud Seddighin et al.AAAI 2021 · 27 citations
- Improved Maximin Guarantees for Subadditive and Fractionally Subadditive Fair Allocation ProblemMasoud Seddighin, Saeed SeddighinAAAI 2022 · 23 citations
- A constant-factor approximation algorithm for Nash Social Welfare with submodular valuationsWenzheng Li, Jan VondrákFOCS 2021 · 23 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- On Optimal Tradeoffs between EFX and Nash WelfareMichal Feldman, Simon Mauras, Tomasz PonitkaAAAI 2024 · 20 citations
- Approximating Nash Social Welfare by Matching and Local SearchJugal Garg, Edin Husic, Wenzheng Li, László A. Végh et al.STOC 2023 · 8 citations
- Compatibility of Fairness and Nash Welfare under Subadditive ValuationsSiddharth Barman, Mashbat SuzukiSODA 2026
- EFX and PO Allocation Exists for Two Types of GoodsVladimir Davidiuk, Yuriy Dementiev, Artur Ignatiev, Danil SagunovAAAI 2026
- Fair allocation of a multiset of indivisible itemsPranay Gorantla, Kunal Marwaha, Santhoshini VelusamySODA 2023 · 13 citations
