Learning with convolution and pooling operations in kernel methods
Theodor Misiakiewicz, Song Mei
Abstract
Recent empirical work has shown that hierarchical convolutional kernels inspired by convolutional neural networks (CNNs) significantly improve the performance of kernel methods in image classification tasks. A widely accepted explanation for their success is that these architectures encode hypothesis classes that are suitable for natural images. However, understanding the precise interplay between approximation and generalization in convolutional architectures remains a challenge. In this paper, we consider the stylized setting of covariates (image pixels) uniformly distributed on the hypercube, and characterize exactly the RKHS of kernels composed of single layers of convolution, pooling, and downsampling operations. We use this characterization to compute sharp asymptotics of the generalization error for any given function in high-dimension. In particular, we quantify the gain in sample complexity brought by enforcing locality with the convolution operation and approximate translation invariance with average pooling. Notably, these results provide a precise description of how convolution and pooling operations trade off approximation with generalization power in one layer convolutional kernels.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 03e5ab03-1285-4a3d-b3d0-3c0d24e11fd5Cited by top-tier papers14
- What can a Single Attention Layer Learn? A Study Through the Random Features LensHengyu Fu, Tianyu Guo, Yu Bai, Song MeiNeurIPS 2023 · 47 citations
- The SSL Interplay: Augmentations, Inductive Bias, and GeneralizationVivien Cabannes, Bobak Toussi Kiani, Randall Balestriero, Yann LeCun et al.ICML 2023 · 43 citations
- Approximation and Learning with Deep Convolutional Models: a Kernel PerspectiveAlberto BiettiICLR 2022 · 33 citations
- Dimension-free deterministic equivalents and scaling laws for random feature regressionLeonardo Defilippis, Bruno Loureiro, Theodor MisiakiewiczNeurIPS 2024 · 28 citations
- On the non-universality of deep learning: quantifying the cost of symmetryEmmanuel Abbe, Enric Boix-AdseràNeurIPS 2022 · 24 citations
Builds on6
- Generalization Error Rates in Kernel Regression: The Crossover from the Noiseless to Noisy RegimeHugo Cui, Bruno Loureiro, Florent Krzakala, Lenka ZdeborováNeurIPS 2021 · 109 citations
- Approximation and Learning with Deep Convolutional Models: a Kernel PerspectiveAlberto BiettiICLR 2022 · 33 citations
- Computational Separation Between Convolutional and Fully-Connected NetworksEran Malach, Shai Shalev-ShwartzICLR 2021 · 32 citations
- Why Are Convolutional Nets More Sample-Efficient than Fully-Connected Nets?Zhiyuan Li, Yi Zhang, Sanjeev AroraICLR 2021 · 22 citations
- The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Patches in Deep Convolutional Kernels MethodsLouis Thiry, Michael Arbel, Eugene Belilovsky, Edouard OyallonICLR 2021 · 16 citations
Related papers
- What Can Be Learnt With Wide Convolutional Neural Networks?Francesco Cagnetta, Alessandro Favero, Matthieu WyartICML 2023 · 16 citations
- Harmonic Decompositions of Convolutional NetworksMeyer Scetbon, Zaïd HarchaouiICML 2020 · 7 citations
- On the Spectral Bias of Convolutional Neural Tangent and Gaussian Process KernelsAmnon Geifman, Meirav Galun, David Jacobs, Ronen BasriNeurIPS 2022 · 22 citations
- Disentangling Trainability and Generalization in Deep Neural NetworksLechao Xiao, Jeffrey Pennington, Samuel Stern SchoenholzICML 2020 · 91 citations
- When Do Neural Networks Outperform Kernel Methods?Behrooz Ghorbani, Song Mei, Theodor Misiakiewicz, Andrea MontanariNeurIPS 2020 · 217 citations
