Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry
Siddharth Narayanan, James D. Braza, Ryan-Rhys Griffiths, Albert Bou, Geemi P. Wellawatte, Mayk Caldas Ramos, Ludovico Mitchener, Michael Pieler, Samuel G. Rodriques, Andrew D. White
Abstract
Reasoning models are large language models that emit a long chain-of-thought before answering, providing both higher accuracy and explicit reasoning for their response. A major question has been whether language model reasoning generalizes beyond mathematics, programming, and logic, where most previous work has focused. We demonstrate that reasoning models can be post-trained for chemistry without additional domain pretraining, and require substantially less data compared to contemporary domain-specific models. We report ether0, a 24B parameter LLM (based on Mistral-Small-24B) that can reason in natural language and respond with chemical structures. This reasoning model was trained with reinforcement learning on 640,730 experimentally-grounded chemistry problems across 375 tasks ranging from synthesizability, to blood-brain barrier permeability, to human receptor activity, to scent. Our model exceeds general-purpose chemistry models, frontier models, and human experts on molecular design tasks. It is also more data efficient relative to specialized models. We anticipate that this method can be applied to train data-efficient language models specialized for tasks across a wide variety of scientific domains.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 038f026e-1295-4afc-a0ce-65707fd3614fCited by top-tier papers5
- BioReason: Incentivizing Multimodal Biological Reasoning within a DNA-LLM ModelAdibvafa Fallahpour, Andrew Magnuson, Purav Gupta, Shihao Ma et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 53 citations
- When Single Answer Is Not Enough: Rethinking Single-Step Retrosynthesis Benchmarks for LLMsBogdan Zagribelnyy, Ivan Ilin, Maksim Kuznetsov, Nikita Bondarev et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- RTMol: Rethinking Molecule-text Alignment in a Round-trip ViewLetian Chen, Runhan Shi, Gufeng Yu, Yang YangAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- LatentChem: From Textual CoT to Latent Thinking in Chemical ReasoningXinwu Ye, Yicheng Mao, Yuxuan Liao, Jia Zhang et al.ICML 2026
- Protein Design with Agent Rosetta: A Case Study for Specialized Scientific AgentsJacopo Teneggi, SM Turzo, Tanya Marwah, Alberto Bietti et al.ICML 2026
Builds on15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
Related papers
- MolecularIQ: Characterizing Chemical Reasoning Capabilities Through Symbolic Verification on Molecular GraphsChristoph Bartmann, Johannes Schimunek, Mykyta Ielanskyi, Philipp Seidl et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Training Language Models to Reason EfficientlyDaman Arora, Andrea ZanetteNeurIPS 2025 · 270 citations
- Retro-R1: LLM-based Agentic RetrosynthesisWei Liu, Jiangtao Feng, Hongli Yu, Yuxuan Song et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
- <tt>G1</tt>: Teaching LLMs to Reason on Graphs with Reinforcement LearningXiaojun Guo, Ang Li, Yifei Wang, Stefanie Jegelka et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 16 citations
- MolErr2Fix: Benchmarking LLM Trustworthiness in Chemistry via Modular Error Detection, Localization, Explanation, and CorrectionYuyang Wu, Jinhui Ye, Shuhao Zhang, Lu Dai et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
