Stereopagnosia: Fooling Stereo Networks with Adversarial Perturbations
Alex Wong, Mukund Mundhra, Stefano Soatto
Abstract
We study the effect of adversarial perturbations of images on the estimates of disparity by deep learning models trained for stereo. We show that imperceptible additive perturbations can significantly alter the disparity map, and correspondingly the perceived geometry of the scene. These perturbations not only affect the specific model they are crafted for, but transfer to models with different architecture, trained with different loss functions. We show that, when used for adversarial data augmentation, our perturbations result in trained models that are more robust, without sacrificing overall accuracy of the model. This is unlike what has been observed in image classification, where adding the perturbed images to the training set makes the model less vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, but to the detriment of overall accuracy. We test our method using the most recent stereo networks and evaluate their performance on public benchmark datasets. : denotes authors with equal contributions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 02f119be-68b3-4818-9fb6-a6e9efbf6e7dCited by top-tier papers14
- Targeted Adversarial Perturbations for Monocular Depth PredictionAlex Wong, Safa Cicek, Stefano SoattoNeurIPS 2020 · 61 citations
- Distracting Downpour: Adversarial Weather Attacks for Motion EstimationJenny Schmalfuss, Lukas Mehl, Andrés BruhnICCV 2023 · 23 citations
- Towards Understanding Adversarial Robustness of Optical Flow NetworksSimon Schrodi, Tonmoy Saikia, Thomas BroxCVPR 2022 · 14 citations
- RobustSpring: Benchmarking Robustness to Image Corruptions for Optical Flow, Scene Flow and StereoVictor Oei, Jenny Schmalfuss, Lukas Mehl, Madlen Bartsch et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Stereoscopic Universal Perturbations across Different Architectures and DatasetsZachary Berger, Parth Agrawal, Tian Yu Liu, Stefano Soatto et al.CVPR 2022 · 8 citations
Builds on5
- DeepPruner: Learning Efficient Stereo Matching via Differentiable PatchMatchShivam Duggal, Shenlong Wang, Wei-Chiu Ma, Rui Hu et al.ICCV 2019 · 300 citations
- How Do Neural Networks See Depth in Single Images?Tom van Dijk, Guido de CroonICCV 2019 · 210 citations
- Attacking Optical FlowAnurag Ranjan, Joel Janai, Andreas Geiger, Michael J. BlackICCV 2019 · 93 citations
- Targeted Adversarial Perturbations for Monocular Depth PredictionAlex Wong, Safa Cicek, Stefano SoattoNeurIPS 2020 · 61 citations
- AANet: Adaptive Aggregation Network for Efficient Stereo MatchingHaofei Xu, Juyong ZhangCVPR 2020
Related papers
- Revisiting Non-Parametric Matching Cost Volumes for Robust and Generalizable Stereo MatchingKelvin Cheng, Tianfu Wu, Christopher G. HealeyNeurIPS 2022 · 5 citations
- Federated Online Adaptation for Deep StereoMatteo Poggi, Fabio TosiCVPR 2024 · 11 citations
- DepthVanish: Optimizing Adversarial Interval Structures for Stereo-Depth-Invisible PatchesYun Xing, Yue Cao, Nhat Chung, Jie M. Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025
- What It Thinks Is Important Is Important: Robustness Transfers Through Input GradientsAlvin Chan, Yi Tay, Yew-Soon OngCVPR 2020
- MaxUp: Lightweight Adversarial Training With Data Augmentation Improves Neural Network TrainingChengyue Gong, Tongzheng Ren, Mao Ye, Qiang LiuCVPR 2021
