LEAP: LLM-powered End-to-end Automatic Library for Processing Social Science Queries on Unstructured Data
Chuxuan Hu, Austin Peters, Daniel Kang
Abstract
Social scientists are increasingly interested in analyzing the semantic information (e.g., emotion) of unstructured data (e.g., Tweets), where the semantic information is not natively present. Performing this analysis in a cost-efficient manner requires using machine learning (ML) models to extract the semantic information and subsequently analyze the now structured data. However, this process remains challenging for domain experts. To demonstrate the challenges in social science analytics, we collect a dataset, QUIET-ML, of 120 real-world social science queries in natural language and their ground truth answers. Existing systems struggle with these queries since (1) they require selecting and applying ML models, and (2) more than a quarter of these queries are vague, making standard tools like natural language to SQL systems unsuited. To address these issues, we develop LEAP, an end-to-end library that answers social science queries in natural language with ML. LEAP filters vague queries to ensure that the answers are deterministic and selects from internally supported and user-defined ML functions to extend the unstructured data to structured tables with necessary annotations. LEAP further generates and executes code to respond to these natural language queries. LEAP achieves a 100% pass @ 3 and 92% pass @ 1 on QUIET-ML, with a 0.02.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 02c6718c-233f-4281-9685-25e9326e2f28Cited by top-tier papers3
- Multi-Objective Agentic Rewrites for Unstructured Data ProcessingLindsey Linxi Wei, Shreya Shankar, Sepanta Zeighami, Yeounoh Chung et al.VLDB 2026 · 15 citations
- Drama : Unifying Data Retrieval and Analysis for Open-Domain Analytic QueriesChuxuan Hu, Maxwell Yang, James Weiland, Yeji Lim et al.SIGMOD 2026 · 2 citations
- ScaleDoc: Scaling LLM-based Predicates over Large Document CollectionsHengrui Zhang, Yulong Hui, Yihao Liu, Huanchen ZhangSIGMOD 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on28
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-CorrectionMohammadreza Pourreza, Davood RafieiNeurIPS 2023 · 909 citations
- Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark EvaluationDawei Gao, Haibin Wang, Yaliang Li, Xiuyu Sun et al.VLDB 2024 · 609 citations
- TAPEX: Table Pre-training via Learning a Neural SQL ExecutorQian Liu, Bei Chen, Jiaqi Guo, Morteza Ziyadi et al.ICLR 2022 · 347 citations
- Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate SpeechMai ElSherief, Caleb Ziems, David Muchlinski, Vaishnavi Anupindi et al.EMNLP 2021 · 159 citations
Related papers
- UQE: A Query Engine for Unstructured DatabasesHanjun Dai, Bethany Wang, Xingchen Wan, Bo Dai et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 45 citations
- Practical and Efficient Model Extraction of Sentiment Analysis APIsWeibin Wu, Jianping Zhang, Victor Junqiu Wei, Xixian Chen et al.ICSE 2023 · 10 citations
- STARQA: A Question Answering Dataset for Complex Analytical Reasoning over Structured DatabasesMounica Maddela, Lingjue Xie, Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, MausamEMNLP 2025
- JENNER: Just-in-time Enrichment in Query ProcessingDhrubajyoti Ghosh, Peeyush Gupta, Sharad Mehrotra, Roberto Yus et al.VLDB 2022 · 5 citations
- SQUAB: Evaluating LLM robustness to Ambiguous and Unanswerable Questions in Semantic ParsingSimone Papicchio, Luca Cagliero, Paolo PapottiEMNLP 2025
