ViLBench: A Suite for Vision-Language Process Reward Modeling
Haoqin Tu, Weitao Feng, Hardy Chen, Hui Liu, Xianfeng Tang, Cihang Xie
Abstract
Process-supervised reward models serve as a fine-grained function that provides detailed step-wise feedback to model responses, facilitating effective selection of reasoning trajectories for complex tasks. Despite its advantages, evaluation on PRMs remains less explored, especially in the multimodal domain. To address this gap, this paper first benchmarks current vision large language models (VLLMs) as two types of reward models: output reward models (ORMs) and process reward models (PRMs) on multiple vision-language benchmarks, which reveal that neither ORM nor PRM consistently outperforms across all tasks, and superior VLLMs do not necessarily yield better rewarding performance. To further advance evaluation, we introduce ViLBench, a vision-language benchmark designed to require intensive process reward signals. Notably, OpenAI's GPT-4o with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) achieves only 27.3% accuracy, indicating the benchmark's challenge for current VLLMs. Lastly, we preliminarily showcase a promising pathway towards bridging the gap between general VLLMs and reward models -- by collecting 73.6K vision-language process reward data using an enhanced tree-search algorithm, our 3B model is able to achieve an average improvement of 3.3% over standard CoT and up to 2.5% compared to its untrained counterpart on ViLBench by selecting OpenAI o1's generations. We release the implementations at https://ucsc-vlaa.github.io/ViLBench with our code, model, and data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 02789a20-637f-4905-9514-c0dac8d4e0c9Cited by top-tier papers4
- RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model EvaluationSaumya Malik, Valentina Pyatkin, Sander Land, Jacob Morrison et al.ICLR 2026 · 139 citations
- Unlocking Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning via Process Reward ModelRuilin Luo, Zhuofan Zheng, Lei Wang, Yifan Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 38 citations
- A Survey of Deep Learning for Geometry Problem SolvingJianzhe Ma, Wenxuan Wang, Qin JinACL 2026 · 5 citations
- Discriminative Visual Process Rewards for Scaling Thinking at Test-Time with ImagesBo-Wen Yin, Qize Yang, Boyuan Sun, Xihan Wei et al.ICML 2026
Builds on19
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question AnsweringPan Lu, Swaroop Mishra, Tanglin Xia, Liang Qiu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,727 citations
- MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual ContextsPan Lu, Hritik Bansal, Tony Xia, Jiacheng Liu et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,472 citations
- Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?Lin Chen, Jinsong Li, Xiaoyi Dong, Pan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1,029 citations
Related papers
- VLRMBench: A Comprehensive and Challenging Benchmark for Vision-Language Reward ModelsJiacheng Ruan, Wenzhen Yuan, Xiqi Gao, Ye Guo et al.ICCV 2025 · 22 citations
- VisualPRM400K: An Effective Dataset for Training Multimodal Process Reward ModelsWeiyun Wang, Zhangwei Gao, Lianjie Chen, Zhe Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 110 citations
- VL-RewardBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Vision-Language Generative Reward ModelsLei Li, Yuancheng Wei, Zhihui Xie, Xuqing Yang et al.CVPR 2025
- Multimodal RewardBench 2: Evaluating Omni Reward Models for Interleaved Text and ImageYushi Hu, Reyhane Askari Hemmat, Melissa Hall, Emily Dinan et al.CVPR 2026 · 18 citations
- GenPRM: Scaling Test-Time Compute of Process Reward Models via Generative ReasoningJian Zhao, Runze Liu, Kaiyan Zhang, Zhimu Zhou et al.AAAI 2026 · 68 citations
