Med-PRM: Medical Reasoning Models with Stepwise, Guideline-verified Process Rewards
Jaehoon Yun, Jiwoong Sohn, Jungwoo Park, Hyunjae Kim, Xiangru Tang, Daniel Shao, Yonghoe Koo, Minhyeok Ko, Qingyu Chen, Mark Gerstein, Michael Moor, Jaewoo Kang
Abstract
Large language models have shown promise in clinical decision making, but current approaches struggle to localize and correct errors at specific steps of the reasoning process. This limitation is critical in medicine, where identifying and addressing reasoning errors is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective patient care. We introduce Med-PRM, a process reward modeling framework that leverages retrieval-augmented generation to verify each reasoning step against established medical knowledge bases. By verifying intermediate reasoning steps with evidence retrieved from clinical guidelines and literature, our model can precisely assess the reasoning quality in a fine-grained manner. Evaluations on five medical QA benchmarks and two open-ended diagnostic tasks demonstrate that Med-PRM achieves state-of-the-art performance, with improving the performance of base models by up to 13.50% using Med-PRM. Moreover, we demonstrate the generality of Med-PRM by integrating it in a plug-and-play fashion with strong policy models such as Meerkat, achieving over 80% accuracy on MedQA for the first time using small-scale models of 8 billion parameters. Our code and data are available at Med-PRM.github.io.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 02674fe2-457e-45f6-8969-57fb6b98b64aCited by top-tier papers4
- Doctor-R1: Mastering Clinical Inquiry with Experiential Agentic Reinforcement LearningYunghwei Lai, Kaiming Liu, Ziyue Wang, Weizhi Ma et al.ICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- Medical thinking with multiple imagesZonghai Yao, Benlu Wang, Yifan Zhang, Junda Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- ORBIT: A Prognostic World Model for Ocular Reasoning Based on Imagined TrajectoriesJiangtao Yan, Yanlin Qu, Yansheng Qiu, Shujian Gao et al.ICML 2026
- Process Reward Agents for Steering Knowledge-Intensive ReasoningJiwoong Sohn, Tomasz Sternal, Kenneth Styppa, Torsten Hoefler et al.ICML 2026
Builds on8
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- MDAgents: An Adaptive Collaboration of LLMs for Medical Decision-MakingYubin Kim, Chanwoo Park, Hyewon Jeong, Yik Siu Chan et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 291 citations
Related papers
- From Conflict to Consensus: Boosting Medical Reasoning via Multi-Round Agentic RAGWenhao Wu, Zhentao Tang, Yafu Li, Shixiong Kai et al.ICML 2026
- Can Large Language Models Match the Conclusions of Systematic Reviews?Christopher Polzak, Alejandro Lozano, Min Woo Sun, James Burgess et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- From Scores to Steps: Diagnosing and Improving LLM Performance in Evidence-Based Medical CalculationsBenlu Wang, Iris Xia, Yifan Zhang, Junda Wang et al.EMNLP 2025
- From Retrieval to Generation: Unifying External and Parametric Knowledge for Medical Question AnsweringLei Li, Xiao Zhou, Yingying Zhang, Xian WuWWW 2026
- Experience Retrieval-Augmentation with Electronic Health Records Enables Accurate Discharge QAJustice Ou, Tinglin Huang, Yilun Zhao, Ziyang Yu et al.ACL 2026 · 9 citations
