KeeA*: Epistemic Exploratory A* Search via Knowledge Calibration
Dengwei Zhao, Shikui Tu, Yanan Sun, Lei Xu
Abstract
In recent years, neural network-guided heuristic search algorithms, such as Monte-Carlo tree search and A * search, have achieved significant advancements across diverse practical applications. Due to the challenges stemming from high statespace complexity, sparse training datasets, and incomplete environmental modeling, heuristic estimations manifest uncontrolled inherent biases towards the actual expected evaluations, thereby compromising the decision-making quality of search algorithms. Sampling exploration enhanced A * (SeeA * ) was proposed to improve the efficiency of A * search by constructing an dynamic candidate subset through random sampling, from which the expanded node was selected. However, uniform sampling strategy utilized by SeeA * facilitates exploration exclusively through the injection of randomness, which completely neglects the heuristic knowledge relevant to open nodes. Moreover, the theoretical support of cluster sampling remains ambiguous. Despite the existence of potential biases, heuristic estimations still encapsulate certain valuable information. In this paper, epistemic exploratory A * search (KeeA * ) is proposed to integrate heuristic knowledge for calibrating the sampling process. We first theoretically demonstrate that SeeA * with cluster sampling outperforms uniform sampling due to the distribution-aware selection with higher variance. Building on this insight, cluster scouting and path-aware sampling are introduced in KeeA * to further exploit heuristic knowledge to increase the sampling mean and variance, respectively, thereby generating higher-quality extreme candidates and enhancing overall decision-making performance. Finally, empirical results on retrosynthetic planning and logic synthesis demonstrate superior performance of KeeA * compared to state-of-the-art heuristic search algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 02269bd7-0243-47bb-9206-dbaa00ab3e06Builds on16
- ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree SearchDan Zhang, Sining Zhoubian, Ziniu Hu, Yisong Yue et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 527 citations
- AlphaZero-Like Tree-Search can Guide Large Language Model Decoding and TrainingZiyu Wan, Xidong Feng, Muning Wen, Stephen Marcus McAleer et al.ICML 2024 · 325 citations
- Retro*: Learning Retrosynthetic Planning with Neural Guided A* SearchBinghong Chen, Chengtao Li, Hanjun Dai, Le SongICML 2020 · 151 citations
- Simulation-guided Beam Search for Neural Combinatorial OptimizationJinho Choo, Yeong-Dae Kwon, Jihoon Kim, Jeongwoo Jae et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 123 citations
- Policy improvement by planning with GumbelIvo Danihelka, Arthur Guez, Julian Schrittwieser, David SilverICLR 2022 · 84 citations
Related papers
- SeeA*: Efficient Exploration-Enhanced A* Search by Selective SamplingDengwei Zhao, Shikui Tu, Lei XuNeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- RetroGraph: Retrosynthetic Planning with Graph SearchShufang Xie, Rui Yan, Peng Han, Yingce Xia et al.KDD 2022 · 22 citations
- From Feasible to Practical: Pareto-Optimal Synthesis PlanningFriedrich Hastedt, Dongda Zhang, Antonio Del rio chanonaICML 2026
- Efficient Optimal Selection for Composited Advertising Creatives with Tree StructureJin Chen, Tiezheng Ge, Gangwei Jiang, Zhiqiang Zhang et al.AAAI 2021 · 8 citations
- Epistemic Monte Carlo Tree SearchYaniv Oren, Viliam Vadocz, Matthijs T. J. Spaan, Wendelin BoehmerICLR 2025
