Lune

LICS2020Top-tier venue

Universal equivalence and majority of probabilistic programs over finite fields

Gilles Barthe, Charlie Jacomme, Steve Kremer

2020Year
5Citations
4Top-tier citations

Abstract

We study decidability problems for equivalence of probabilistic programs, for a core probabilistic programming language over finite fields of fixed characteristic. The programming language supports uniform sampling, addition, multiplication and conditionals and thus is sufficiently expressive to encode boolean and arithmetic circuits. We consider two variants of equivalence: the first one considers an interpretation over the finite field F 𝑞 , while the second one, which we call universal equivalence, verifies equivalence over all extensions F 𝑞 𝑘 of F 𝑞 . The universal variant typically arises in provable cryptography when one wishes to prove equivalence for any length of bitstrings, i.e., elements of F 2 𝑘 for any 𝑘. While the first problem is obviously decidable, we establish its exact complexity which lies in the counting hierarchy. To show decidability, and a doubly exponential upper bound, of the universal variant we rely on results from algorithmic number theory and the possibility to compare local zeta functions associated to given polynomials. Finally we study several variants of the equivalence problem, including a problem we call majority, motivated by differential privacy.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 021922f9-956d-45dd-9e46-de54f4429fb2

Cited by top-tier papers4

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on1

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines