Positional Fragility in LLMs: How Offset Effects Reshape Our Understanding of Memorization Risks
Yixuan Even Xu, Antoine Bosselut, Imanol Schlag
Abstract
Large language models are known to memorize parts of their training data, posing risk of copyright violations. To systematically examine this risk, we pretrain language models (1B/3B/8B) from scratch on 83B tokens, mixing web-scale data with public domain books used to simulate copyrighted content at controlled frequencies at lengths at least ten times longer than prior work. We thereby identified the offset effect, a phenomenon characterized by two key findings: (1) verbatim memorization is most strongly triggered by short prefixes drawn from the beginning of the context window, with memorization decreasing counterintuitively as prefix length increases; and (2) a sharp decline in verbatim recall when prefix begins offset from the initial tokens of the context window. We attribute this to positional fragility: models rely disproportionately on the earliest tokens in their context window as retrieval anchors, making them sensitive to even slight shifts. We further observe that when the model fails to retrieve memorized content, it often produces degenerated text. Leveraging these findings, we show that shifting sensitive data deeper into the context window suppresses both extractable memorization and degeneration. Our results suggest that positional offset is a critical and previously overlooked axis for evaluating memorization risks, since prior work implicitly assumed uniformity by probing only from the beginning of training sequences.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention SinksGuangxuan Xiao, Yuandong Tian, Beidi Chen, Song Han et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,714 citations
- Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models BetterKatherine Lee, Daphne Ippolito, Andrew Nystrom, Chiyuan Zhang et al.ACL 2022 · 844 citations
- Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language ModelsNikhil Kandpal, Eric Wallace, Colin RaffelICML 2022 · 395 citations
- Emergent and Predictable Memorization in Large Language ModelsStella Biderman, USVSN Sai Prashanth, Lintang Sutawika, Hailey Schoelkopf et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 205 citations
Related papers
- Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Daphne Ippolito, Matthew Jagielski, Katherine Lee et al.ICLR 2023 · 158 citations
- Demystifying Verbatim Memorization in Large Language ModelsJing Huang, Diyi Yang, Christopher PottsEMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- Unlocking Memorization in Large Language Models with Dynamic Soft PromptingZhepeng Wang, Runxue Bao, Yawen Wu, Jackson Taylor et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Hubble: a Model Suite to Advance the Study of LLM MemorizationJohnny Wei, Ameya Godbole, Mohammad Aflah Khan, Ryan Yixiang Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 22 citations
- Measuring Non-Adversarial Reproduction of Training Data in Large Language ModelsMichael Aerni, Javier Rando, Edoardo Debenedetti, Nicholas Carlini et al.ICLR 2025
