Log-Sum-Exponential Estimator for Off-Policy Evaluation and Learning
Armin Behnamnia, Gholamali Aminian, Alireza Aghaei, Chengchun Shi, Vincent Y. F. Tan, Hamid R. Rabiee
Abstract
Off-policy learning and evaluation leverage logged bandit feedback datasets, which contain context, action, propensity score, and feedback for each data point. These scenarios face significant challenges due to high variance and poor performance with low-quality propensity scores and heavy-tailed reward distributions. We address these issues by introducing a novel estimator based on the log-sum-exponential (LSE) operator, which outperforms traditional inverse propensity score estimators. Our LSE estimator demonstrates variance reduction and robustness under heavy-tailed conditions. For off-policy evaluation, we derive upper bounds on the estimator's bias and variance. In the off-policy learning scenario, we establish bounds on the regret-the performance gap between our LSE estimator and the optimal policy-assuming bounded (1 + ϵ)-th moment of weighted reward. Notably, we achieve a convergence rate of O(n -ϵ/(1+ϵ) ) for the regret bounds, where ϵ ∈ [0, 1] and n is the size of logged bandit feedback dataset. Theoretical analysis is complemented by comprehensive empirical evaluations in both off-policy learning and evaluation scenarios, confirming the practical advantages of our approach. The code for our estimator is available at the following link: https: //github.com/armin-behnamnia/ lse-offpolicy-learning .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 01e3cb99-f599-4e25-a241-88a08f0921cdCited by top-tier papers2
- Demystifying the Paradox of Importance Sampling with an Estimated History-Dependent Behavior Policy in Off-Policy EvaluationHongyi Zhou, Josiah P. Hanna, Jin Zhu, Ying Yang et al.ICML 2025
- Generalization and Robustness of the Tilted Empirical RiskGholamali Aminian, Amir R. Asadi, Tian Li, Ahmad Beirami et al.ICML 2025
Builds on17
- Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?Ying Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangICML 2021 · 419 citations
- Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of PessimismParia Rashidinejad, Banghua Zhu, Cong Ma, Jiantao Jiao et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 373 citations
- Policy Teaching via Environment Poisoning: Training-time Adversarial Attacks against Reinforcement LearningAmin Rakhsha, Goran Radanovic, Rati Devidze, Xiaojin Zhu et al.ICML 2020 · 145 citations
- Doubly robust off-policy evaluation with shrinkageYi Su, Maria Dimakopoulou, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Miroslav DudíkICML 2020 · 128 citations
- Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via EmbeddingsYuta Saito, Thorsten JoachimsICML 2022 · 62 citations
Related papers
- Uncertainty-Aware Instance Reweighting for Off-Policy LearningXiaoying Zhang, Junpu Chen, Hongning Wang, Hong Xie et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 6 citations
- Off-Policy Evaluation for Ranking Policies under Deterministic Logging PoliciesKoichi Tanaka, Kazuki Kawamura, Takanori Muroi, Yusuke Narita et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Off-Policy Evaluation with Deficient Support Using Side InformationNicolò Felicioni, Maurizio Ferrari Dacrema, Marcello Restelli, Paolo CremonesiNeurIPS 2022 · 19 citations
- Off-policy Bandits with Deficient SupportNoveen Sachdeva, Yi Su, Thorsten JoachimsKDD 2020 · 22 citations
- Marginal Density Ratio for Off-Policy Evaluation in Contextual BanditsMuhammad Faaiz Taufiq, Arnaud Doucet, Rob Cornish, Jean-Francois TonNeurIPS 2023 · 14 citations
