Toward a More Inclusive Gig Economy: Risks and Opportunities for Workers with Disabilities
Shruti Sannon, Dan Cosley
Abstract
Little is known about whether and how workers with disabilities participate in the many on-demand labor platforms that make up the growing gig economy. Understanding disabled gig workers' experiences is a vital step toward developing inclusive and equitable labor platforms. Through interviews with 24 disabled gig workers and observational fieldwork, we present a rich, in-depth picture of the opportunities and challenges presented by four main types of gig work (ridesharing, delivery, crowdwork, and freelancing) for workers with a wide range of disabilities. We identify a key tension: gig work can be a vital source of needed income for workers who have been excluded from traditional workplaces, but at the same time, the structure of gig platforms present workers with a host of new disability-related challenges, including around algorithmic control and performance evaluation. We discuss how this tension plays out in terms of how workers engage in gig work and protect themselves from risk. We also call attention to how many workers can face complicated, intersectional challenges based on multiple marginalized identities in addition to disability, such as race, gender, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status. Our work contributes to research on the gig economy by centering the perspectives of workers who are marginalized based on disability and other identities. We show how workers face several penalties based on disability, including shouldering extensive invisible labor to mitigate the challenges they face. Based on our interviews, we suggest several ways that on-demand labor platforms can be designed to be more inclusive of disability, including how to improve the accessibility of various tasks while mitigating the discrimination and negative interactions faced by disabled workers.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 016be9ed-4789-4e08-b98d-866158ce87f4Cited by top-tier papers11
- SoK: Safer Digital-Safety Research Involving At-Risk UsersRosanna Bellini, Emily Tseng, Noel Warford, Alaa Daffalla et al.S&P 2024 · 48 citations
- Platformization of Inequality: Gender and Race in Digital Labor PlatformsIsabel Muñoz, Pyeonghwa Kim, Clea O'Neil, Michael Dunn et al.CSCW 2024 · 29 citations
- Gig2Gether: Datasharing to Empower, Unify and Demystify Gig WorkJane Hsieh, Angie Zhang, Sajel Surati, Sijia Xie et al.CHI 2025 · 20 citations
- Not Just A Dot on The Map: Food Delivery Workers as InfrastructureRiyaj Isamiya Shaikh, Anubha Singh, Barry Brown, Airi LampinenCHI 2024 · 17 citations
- Safer Algorithmically-Mediated Offline Introductions: Harms and Protective BehaviorsVeronica A. Rivera, Daricia Wilkinson, Aurelia Augusta, Sophie Li et al.CSCW 2024 · 3 citations
Related papers
- Privacy, Surveillance, and Power in the Gig EconomyShruti Sannon, Billie Sun, Dan CosleyCHI 2022 · 60 citations
- "Why lose control?" A Study of Freelancers' Experiences with Gig Economy PlatformsJuan Carlos Alvarez de la Vega, Marta E. Cecchinato, John RooksbyCHI 2021 · 55 citations
- "Brush it Off": How Women Workers Manage and Cope with Bias and Harassment in Gender-agnostic Gig PlatformsNing F. Ma, Veronica A. Rivera, Zheng Yao, Dongwook YoonCHI 2022 · 46 citations
- Understanding the Microtask Crowdsourcing Experience for Workers with Disabilities: A Comparative ViewAmy Rechkemmer, Ming YinCSCW 2022 · 14 citations
- Watched, but Moving: Platformization of Beauty Work and Its Gendered Mechanisms of ControlIra Anjali Anwar, Joyojeet Pal, Julie HuiCSCW 2020 · 75 citations
