CAT: Contrastive Adversarial Training for Evaluating the Robustness of Protective Perturbations in Latent Diffusion Models
Sen Peng, Mingyue Wang, Jianfei He, Jijia Yang, Xiaohua Jia
Abstract
Latent diffusion models have recently demonstrated superior capabilities in many downstream image synthesis tasks. However, customization of latent diffusion models using unauthorized data can severely compromise the privacy and intellectual property rights of data owners. Adversarial examples as protective perturbations have been developed to defend against unauthorized data usage by introducing imperceptible noise to customization samples, preventing diffusion models from effectively learning them. In this paper, we first reveal that the primary reason adversarial examples are effective as protective perturbations in latent diffusion models is the distortion of their latent representations, as demonstrated through qualitative and quantitative experiments. We then propose the Contrastive Adversarial Training (CAT) utilizing lightweight adapters as an adaptive attack against these protection methods, highlighting their lack of robustness. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our CAT method significantly reduces the effectiveness of protective perturbations in customization, urging the community to reconsider and improve the robustness of existing protective perturbations. The code is available at https://github.com/senp98/CAT .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0141d58c-21e8-4cd7-8b10-7d5fe95eb7efCited by top-tier papers2
- BlurGuard: A Simple Approach for Robustifying Image Protection Against AI-Powered EditingJinsu Kim, Yunhun Nam, Minseon Kim, Sangpil Kim et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- DDIM Inversion as a Perturbation Amplifier: Breaking Mimicry Protection via Reconstruction Error MinimizationHuming Qiu, Peiyi Chen, Mi Zhang, Geng Hong et al.ICML 2026
Builds on19
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image SynthesisPrafulla Dhariwal, Alexander Quinn NicholNeurIPS 2021 · 13,211 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Palette: Image-to-Image Diffusion ModelsChitwan Saharia, William Chan, Huiwen Chang, Chris A. Lee et al.SIGGRAPH 2022 · 1,638 citations
- Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of ImagesJianyi Wang, Kelvin C. K. Chan, Chen Change LoyAAAI 2023 · 1,208 citations
Related papers
- Perturbing Attention Gives You More Bang for the Buck: Subtle Imaging Perturbations That Efficiently Fool Customized Diffusion ModelsJingyao Xu, Yuetong Lu, Yandong Li, Siyang Lu et al.CVPR 2024 · 8 citations
- Latent Diffusion Unlearning: Protecting Against Unauthorized Personalization Through Trajectory Shifted PerturbationsNaresh Kumar Devulapally, Shruti Agarwal, Tejas Gokhale, Vishnu Suresh LokhandeACM MM 2025 · 1 citation
- Prompt-Agnostic Adversarial Perturbation for Customized Diffusion ModelsCong Wan, Yuhang He, Xiang Song, Yihong GongNeurIPS 2024 · 22 citations
- Watermark-embedded Adversarial Examples for Copyright Protection against Diffusion ModelsPeifei Zhu, Tsubasa Takahashi, Hirokatsu KataokaCVPR 2024 · 14 citations
- Bypassing Copyright Protection in Diffusion-based Customization via Two-Stage Latent Feature OptimizationZiang Xu, Wenbo Yu, Hongyao Yu, Hao Fang et al.KDD 2026 · 2 citations
