The Power of Anomaly Detection in Predictive Maintenance: [Experiments & Analysis]
Anastasios Papadopoulos, Apostolos Giannoulidis, Anastasios Gounaris, John Paparrizos
Abstract
Predictive maintenance (PdM) is a key application of the industrial IoT, using sensor-acquired time-series data to forecast equipment failures that cost billions of dollars annually. Time-series anomaly detection (TSAD) offers a promising route to PdM, yet prior work is constrained by: i) reliance on private datasets or case studies, requiring extensive domain-specific engineering; ii) evaluation of only a small number of algorithms, limiting comparative insight; iii) use of a single implementation strategy per algorithm, hindering potential improvements; iv) emphasis on supervised solutions, necessitating annotated data that are costly or unavailable in practice; and v) neglect of runtime and online applicability, raising questions about deployability. To address these limitations, we present an extensive experimental study with rigorous statistical analysis conducted within a common evaluation framework. Our objectives are to: i) provide insights into the accuracy, robustness, and behavior of TSAD techniques in an online PdM setting across four implementation strategies; ii) analyze effectiveness–runtime trade-offs; and iii) rate dataset difficulty and characterize the forms exhibited by anomalies preceding machine breakdowns. Our findings indicate that most industrial cases benefit from an initial calibration phase for operational data collection. Well-established traditional TSAD methods deliver the best trade-off among effectiveness, runtime efficiency, and the ability to predict individual failure types; pre-trained LLMs are still statistically outperformed in this context, suggesting that there is still room for improvement in that direction. Our study serves as a significant step towards disseminating TSAD for PdM and we open source our work to support future research.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 008e7c90-04fb-4e93-9d57-367411a791c9Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on41
- Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?Ailing Zeng, Muxi Chen, Lei Zhang, Qiang XuAAAI 2023 · 3,619 citations
- TranAD: Deep Transformer Networks for Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series DataShreshth Tuli, Giuliano Casale, Nicholas R. JenningsVLDB 2022 · 930 citations
- PyTorch 2: Faster Machine Learning Through Dynamic Python Bytecode Transformation and Graph CompilationJason Ansel, Edward Z. Yang, Horace He, Natalia Gimelshein et al.ASPLOS 2024 · 693 citations
- Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly DetectionLukas Ruff, Robert A. Vandermeulen, Nico Görnitz, Alexander Binder et al.ICLR 2020 · 678 citations
- Anomaly Detection in Time Series: A Comprehensive EvaluationSebastian Schmidl, Phillip Wenig, Thorsten PapenbrockVLDB 2022 · 578 citations
Related papers
- A Stitch in Time Saves Nine: Enabling Early Anomaly Detection with Correlation AnalysisYihao Ang, Qiang Huang, Anthony K. H. Tung, Zhiyong HuangICDE 2023 · 6 citations
- Delving into Large Language Models for Effective Time-Series Anomaly DetectionJunwoo Park, Kyudan Jung, Dohyun Lee, Hyuck Lee et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- TAB: Unified Benchmarking of Time Series Anomaly Detection MethodsXiangfei Qiu, Zhe Li, Wanghui Qiu, Shiyan Hu et al.VLDB 2025 · 57 citations
- Harnessing Vision-Language Models for Time Series Anomaly DetectionZelin He, Sarah Alnegheimish, Matthew ReimherrAAAI 2026 · 10 citations
- PeFAD: A Parameter-Efficient Federated Framework for Time Series Anomaly DetectionRonghui Xu, Hao Miao, Senzhang Wang, Philip S. Yu et al.KDD 2024 · 32 citations
