The Coverage Principle: How Pre-Training Enables Post-Training
Fan Chen, Audrey Huang, Noah Golowich, Sadhika Malladi, Adam Block, Jordan T. Ash, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Dylan J Foster
Abstract
Language models demonstrate remarkable abilities when pre-trained on large text corpora and fine-tuned for specific tasks, but how and why pre-training shapes the success of the final model remains poorly understood. Notably, although pre-training success is often quantified by cross entropy loss, cross entropy can be poorly predictive of downstream performance. Instead, we provide a theoretical perspective on this relationship through the lens of coverage, which quantifies the probability mass the pre-trained model places on high-quality responses and which is necessary and sufficient for post-training and test-time scaling methods like Best-of-N to succeed. Our main results develop an understanding of the coverage principle, a phenomenon whereby next-token prediction implicitly optimizes toward a model with good coverage. In particular, we uncover a mechanism that explains the power of coverage in predicting downstream performance: coverage generalizes faster than cross entropy, avoiding spurious dependence on problem dependent parameters such as the sequence length. We also study practical algorithmic interventions with provable benefits for improving coverage, including (i) model/checkpoint selection procedures, (ii) gradient normalization schemes, and (iii) test-time decoding strategies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 00717ce4-abeb-42a4-8be1-214f3b3962fbCited by top-tier papers7
- Posterior Behavioral Cloning: Pretraining BC Policies for Efficient RL FinetuningAndrew Wagenmaker, Perry Dong, Raymond Tsao, Chelsea Finn et al.ICML 2026 · 10 citations
- From Prior to Pro: Efficient Skill Mastery via Distribution Contractive RL FinetuningZhanyi Sun, shuran songICML 2026 · 6 citations
- On the Emergence of Implicit Curriculum in RLVR Learning DynamicsYu Huang, Zixin Wen, Yuejie Chi, Yuting Wei et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
- From Reasoning Traces to Reusable Modules: Understanding Compositional Generalization in Language Model ReasoningLingjing Kong, Xin Liu, Guangyi Chen, Martin Q. Ma et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- A Theoretical Framework for Statistical Evaluability of Generative ModelsShashaank Aiyer, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran, Han ShaoICML 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on31
- Can Language Models Solve Graph Problems in Natural Language?Heng Wang, Shangbin Feng, Tianxing He, Zhaoxuan Tan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 420 citations
- Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?Ying Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangICML 2021 · 419 citations
- Talk like a Graph: Encoding Graphs for Large Language ModelsBahare Fatemi, Jonathan Halcrow, Bryan PerozziICLR 2024 · 194 citations
- The Pitfalls of Next-Token PredictionGregor Bachmann, Vaishnavh NagarajanICML 2024 · 163 citations
- Beyond Chinchilla-Optimal: Accounting for Inference in Language Model Scaling LawsNikhil Sardana, Jacob P. Portes, Sasha Doubov, Jonathan FrankleICML 2024 · 144 citations
Related papers
- Improving Diversity in Language Models: When Temperature Fails, Change the LossAlexandre Verine, Florian Le Bronnec, Kunhao Zheng, Alexandre Allauzen et al.ICML 2025
- Temporal Scaling Law for Large Language ModelsYizhe Xiong, Xiansheng Chen, Xin Ye, Hui Chen et al.EMNLP 2025
- A Mathematical Exploration of Why Language Models Help Solve Downstream TasksNikunj Saunshi, Sadhika Malladi, Sanjeev AroraICLR 2021 · 93 citations
- A Simple Model of Inference Scaling LawsNoam Itzhak LeviICML 2025
- Large Language Models to Diffusion FinetuningEdoardo Cetin, Tianyu Zhao, Yujin TangICML 2025
