Function-space Inference with Sparse Implicit Processes
Simón Rodríguez Santana, Bryan Zaldivar, Daniel Hernández-Lobato
Abstract
Implicit Processes (IPs) represent a flexible framework that can be used to describe a wide variety of models, from Bayesian neural networks, neural samplers and data generators to many others. IPs also allow for approximate inference in function-space. This change of formulation solves intrinsic degenerate problems of parameter-space approximate inference concerning the high number of parameters and their strong dependencies in large models. For this, previous works in the literature have attempted to employ IPs both to set up the prior and to approximate the resulting posterior. However, this has proven to be a challenging task. Existing methods that can tune the prior IP result in a Gaussian predictive distribution, which fails to capture important data patterns. By contrast, methods producing flexible predictive distributions by using another IP to approximate the posterior process cannot tune the prior IP to the observed data. We propose here the first method that can accomplish both goals. For this, we rely on an inducing-point representation of the prior IP, as often done in the context of sparse Gaussian processes. The result is a scalable method for approximate inference with IPs that can tune the prior IP parameters to the data, and that provides accurate non-Gaussian predictive distributions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0032755d-aa7f-49f3-8274-7e37d570174eCited by top-tier papers7
- A Rigorous Link between Deep Ensembles and (Variational) Bayesian MethodsVeit David Wild, Sahra Ghalebikesabi, Dino Sejdinovic, Jeremias KnoblauchNeurIPS 2023 · 40 citations
- Deep Variational Implicit ProcessesLuis A. Ortega, Simón Rodríguez Santana, Daniel Hernández-LobatoICLR 2023 · 15 citations
- Spectral Convolutional Conditional Neural ProcessesPeiman Mohseni, Nick DuffieldNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- Variational Mixture of HyperGenerators for Learning Distributions over FunctionsBatuhan Koyuncu, Pablo Sánchez-Martín, Ignacio Peis, Pablo M. Olmos et al.ICML 2023 · 7 citations
- Function Space Bayesian Pseudocoreset for Bayesian Neural NetworksBalhae Kim, Hyungi Lee, Juho LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 3 citations
Builds on4
- How Good is the Bayes Posterior in Deep Neural Networks Really?Florian Wenzel, Kevin Roth, Bastiaan S. Veeling, Jakub Swiatkowski et al.ICML 2020 · 409 citations
- On the Expressiveness of Approximate Inference in Bayesian Neural NetworksAndrew Y. K. Foong, David R. Burt, Yingzhen Li, Richard E. TurnerNeurIPS 2020 · 142 citations
- Functional Variational Inference based on Stochastic Process GeneratorsChao Ma, José Miguel Hernández-LobatoNeurIPS 2021 · 28 citations
- Sparse Uncertainty Representation in Deep Learning with Inducing WeightsHippolyt Ritter, Martin Kukla, Cheng Zhang, Yingzhen LiNeurIPS 2021 · 23 citations
Related papers
- Input Dependent Sparse Gaussian ProcessesBahram Jafrasteh, Carlos Villacampa-Calvo, Daniel Hernández-LobatoICML 2022 · 7 citations
- MARS: Meta-learning as Score Matching in the Function SpaceKrunoslav Lehman Pavasovic, Jonas Rothfuss, Andreas KrauseICLR 2023 · 1 citation
- Tractable Function-Space Variational Inference in Bayesian Neural NetworksTim G. J. Rudner, Zonghao Chen, Yee Whye Teh, Yarin GalNeurIPS 2022 · 70 citations
- Parametric Gaussian Process RegressorsMartin Jankowiak, Geoff Pleiss, Jacob R. GardnerICML 2020 · 82 citations
- Fully Bayesian Autoencoders with Latent Sparse Gaussian ProcessesBa-Hien Tran, Babak Shahbaba, Stephan Mandt, Maurizio FilipponeICML 2023 · 9 citations
