On Fair Division under Heterogeneous Matroid Constraints
Amitay Dror, Michal Feldman, Erel Segal-Halevi
Abstract
We study fair allocation of indivisible goods among additive agents with feasibility constraints. In these settings, every agent is restricted to get a bundle among a specified set of feasible bundles. Such scenarios have been of great interest to the AI community due to their applicability to real-world problems. Following some impossibility results, we restrict attention to matroid feasibility constraints that capture natural scenarios, such as the allocation of shifts to medical doctors, and the allocation of conference papers to referees. We focus on the common fairness notion of envy-freeness up to one good (EF1). Previous algorithms for finding EF1 allocations are either restricted to agents with identical feasibility constraints, or allow free disposal of items. An open problem is the existence of EF1 complete allocations among heterogeneous agents, where the heterogeneity is both in the agents' feasibility constraints and in their valuations. In this work, we make progress on this problem by providing positive and negative results for different matroid and valuation types. Among other results, we devise polynomial-time algorithms for finding EF1 allocations in the following settings: (i) n agents with heterogeneous partition matroids and heterogeneous binary valuations, (ii) 2 agents with heterogeneous partition matroids and heterogeneous additive valuations, and (iii) at most 3 agents with heterogeneous binary valuations and identical base-orderable matroid constraints. 1. A preliminary version appeared in the proceedings of AAAI 2021 (Dror, Feldman, & Segal-Halevi, 2021) , without most of the proofs. This version contains all omitted proofs, an uptodate literature survey, a more general non-existence result in Subsection 3.3, a simpler proof of Theorem 5, and simpler algorithms and proofs in Section 8.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers8
- The Price of Connectivity in Fair DivisionXiaohui Bei, Ayumi Igarashi, Xinhang Lu, Warut SuksompongAAAI 2021 · 52 citations
- Fair Scheduling for Time-dependent ResourcesBo Li, Minming Li, Ruilong ZhangNeurIPS 2021 · 23 citations
- Temporal Fair DivisionBenjamin Cookson, Soroush Ebadian, Nisarg ShahAAAI 2025 · 14 citations
- Constrained Fair and Efficient AllocationsBenjamin Cookson, Soroush Ebadian, Nisarg ShahAAAI 2025 · 10 citations
- Maximizing Nash Social Welfare under Two-Sided PreferencesPallavi Jain, Rohit VaishAAAI 2024 · 10 citations
Builds on3
- Fair and Truthful Mechanisms for Dichotomous ValuationsMoshe Babaioff, Tomer Ezra, Uriel FeigeAAAI 2021 · 131 citations
- The Price of Connectivity in Fair DivisionXiaohui Bei, Ayumi Igarashi, Xinhang Lu, Warut SuksompongAAAI 2021 · 52 citations
- Fair Scheduling for Time-dependent ResourcesBo Li, Minming Li, Ruilong ZhangNeurIPS 2021 · 23 citations
Related papers
- Fair Division with Prioritized AgentsXiaolin Bu, Zihao Li, Shengxin Liu, Jiaxin Song et al.AAAI 2023 · 1 citation
- Fair and Efficient Balanced Allocation for Indivisible GoodsYasushi Kawase, Ryoga MaharaAAAI 2026
- Finding Fair Allocations under Budget ConstraintsSiddharth Barman, Arindam Khan, Sudarshan Shyam, K. V. N. SreenivasAAAI 2023 · 20 citations
- Fair allocation of a multiset of indivisible itemsPranay Gorantla, Kunal Marwaha, Santhoshini VelusamySODA 2023 · 13 citations
- Fair Division of Mixed Divisible and Indivisible GoodsXiaohui Bei, Zihao Li, Jinyan Liu, Shengxin Liu et al.AAAI 2020 · 50 citations
