PLAID: Supporting Computing Instructors to Identify Domain-Specific Programming Plans at Scale
Yoshee Jain, Mehmet Arif Demirtas, Kathryn I. Cunningham
Abstract
Pedagogical approaches focusing on stereotypical code solutions, known as programming plans, can increase problem-solving ability and motivate diverse learners. However, plan-focused pedagogies are rarely used beyond introductory programming. Our formative study (N=10 educators) showed that identifying plans is a tedious process. To advance plan-focused pedagogies in application-focused domains, we created an LLM-powered pipeline that automates the effortful parts of educators' plan identification process by providing use-case-driven program examples and candidate plans. In design workshops (N=7 educators), we identified design goals to maximize instructors' efficiency in plan identification by optimizing interaction with this LLM-generated content. Our resulting tool, PLAID, enables instructors to access a corpus of relevant programs to inspire plan identification, compare code snippets to assist plan refinement, and facilitates them in structuring code snippets into plans. We evaluated PLAID in a within-subjects user study (N=12 educators) and found that PLAID led to lower cognitive demand and increased productivity compared to the state-of-the-art. Educators found PLAID beneficial for generating instructional material. Thus, our findings suggest that human-in-the-loop approaches hold promise for supporting plan-focused pedagogies at scale.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on10
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- CodeAid: Evaluating a Classroom Deployment of an LLM-based Programming Assistant that Balances Student and Educator NeedsMajeed Kazemitabaar, Runlong Ye, Xiaoning Wang, Austin Zachary Henley et al.CHI 2024 · 246 citations
- Teach AI How to Code: Using Large Language Models as Teachable Agents for Programming EducationHyoungwook Jin, Seonghee Lee, Hyungyu Shin, Juho KimCHI 2024 · 94 citations
- Improving Instruction of Programming Patterns with Faded Parsons ProblemsNathaniel Weinman, Armando Fox, Marti A. HearstCHI 2021 · 60 citations
Related papers
- From Code Generation to Conceptual Learning: Student Use of LLMs in a Web Programming CourseHajara-Yasmin Isa, Matthew Weston, Muhammad Rizky Wellyanto, Ishita Karna et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Live in the Loop: Rapid Run-time Feedback for PromptsToni Mattis, Abdullatif Ghajar, Tom Beckmann, Robert HirschfeldCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Synthetic Programming Elicitation for Text-to-Code in Very Low-Resource Programming and Formal LanguagesFederico Mora, Justin Wong, Haley Lepe, Sahil Bhatia et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 21 citations
- Interactive and Expressive Code-Augmented Planning with Large Language ModelsAnthony Zhe Liu, Xinhe Wang, Jacob Sansom, Yao Fu et al.ACL 2025 · 4 citations
- PACE: Unleashing the Power of Code Embeddings to Boost AutoML AgentsGangyi Zhao, Hebin Liang, Hongyao Tang, Yi Ma et al.KDD 2026
