Manipulating dropout reveals an optimal balance of efficiency and robustness in biological and machine visual systems
Jacob S. Prince, Gabriel Fajardo, George A. Alvarez, Talia Konkle
Abstract
According to the efficient coding hypothesis, neural populations encode information optimally when representations are high-dimensional and uncorrelated. However, such codes may carry a cost in terms of generalization and robustness. Past empirical studies of early visual cortex (V1) in rodents have suggested that this tradeoff indeed constrains sensory representations. However, it remains unclear whether these insights generalize across the hierarchy of the human visual system, and particularly to object representations in high-level occipitotemporal cortex (OTC). To gain new empirical clarity, here we develop a family of object recognition models with parametrically varying dropout proportion (p), which induces systematically varying dimensionality of internal responses (while controlling all other inductive biases). We find that increasing dropout produces an increasingly smooth, low-dimensional representational space. Optimal robustness to lesioning is observed at around 70% dropout, after which both accuracy and robustness decline. Representational comparison to large-scale 7T fMRI data from occipitotemporal cortex in the Natural Scenes Dataset reveals that this optimal degree of dropout is also associated with maximal emergent neural predictivity. Finally, using new techniques for achieving denoised estimates of the eigenspectrum of human fMRI responses, we compare the rate of eigenspectrum decay between model and brain feature spaces. We observe that the match between model and brain representations is associated with a common balance between efficiency and robustness in the representational space. These results suggest that varying dropout may reveal an optimal point of balance between the efficiency of high-dimensional codes and the robustness of low dimensional codes in hierarchical vision systems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 00025fa6-eeaa-4d06-a7bb-220469fe7f63Builds on4
- Dropout Reduces UnderfittingZhuang Liu, Zhiqiu Xu, Joseph Jin, Zhiqiang Shen et al.ICML 2023 · 60 citations
- A Spectral Theory of Neural Prediction and AlignmentAbdulkadir Canatar, Jenelle Feather, Albert J. Wakhloo, SueYeon ChungNeurIPS 2023 · 29 citations
- Frivolous Units: Wider Networks Are Not Really That WideStephen Casper, Xavier Boix, Vanessa D'Amario, Ling Guo et al.AAAI 2021 · 20 citations
- FFCV: Accelerating Training by Removing Data BottlenecksGuillaume Leclerc, Andrew Ilyas, Logan Engstrom, Sung Min Park et al.CVPR 2023
Related papers
- Characterizing the Ventral Visual Stream with Response-Optimized Neural Encoding ModelsMeenakshi Khosla, Keith Jamison, Amy Kuceyeski, Mert R. SabuncuNeurIPS 2022 · 16 citations
- Dimensionality Mismatch Between Brains and Artificial Neural NetworksSantiago Galella, Maren H. Wehrheim, Matthias KaschubeNeurIPS 2025
- Meta-Learning In-Context Enables Training-Free Cross Subject Brain DecodingMu Nan, Muquan Yu, Weijian Mai, Jacob S. Prince et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- Prune and distill: similar reformatting of image information along rat visual cortex and deep neural networksPaolo Muratore, Sina Tafazoli, Eugenio Piasini, Alessandro Laio et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 11 citations
- Model-Behavior Alignment under Flexible Evaluation: When the Best-Fitting Model Isn't the Right OneItamar Avitan, Tal GolanNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
