Lune

ACL Findings2026

Failure makes the agent stronger: Enhancing Accuracy through Structured Reflection for Reliable Tool Interactions

Junhao Su, Yuanliang Wan, Junwei Yang, Hengyu Shi, Tianyang Han, Yurui Qiu, Junfeng Luo

摘要

Tool-augmented large language models (LLMs) are typically trained via supervised imitation learning or coarse-grained reinforcement learning, approaches that primarily optimize one-shot tool calls. Existing practices of self-reflection largely rely on heuristic prompting or unidirectional reasoning traces: the model is encouraged to "think more," rather than to treat error diagnosis and correction as a learnable capability. This makes them fragile in multi-turn interaction settings-once a call fails, the model tends to repeat the same mistake instead of recovering. To address this issue, we propose structured reflection, which transforms the "from error to repair" process into a first-class, controllable, and trainable action. The agent produces a concise yet precise reflection process: specifically, the model diagnoses the error based on evidence from the previous step and then proposes a correct and executable follow-up call. During training, we combine DAPO and GSPO's objective functions and design a more principled reward mechanism tailored to tool calling, optimizing the stepwise strategy Reflect → Call → Final. To evaluate this capability, we introduce Tool-Reflection-Bench, a lightweight benchmark dataset that programmatically verifies structural validity, executability, parameter correctness, and result consistency. Tasks in the benchmark are constructed as miniature trajectories of Erroneous Call → Reflection → Corrected Call and are split into disjoint training and testing sets. Experiments on BFCL v3 and Tool-Reflection-Bench show that our method achieves significant improvements in multi-turn tool-call success rates and error recovery, while also reducing redundant calls. These results demonstrate that making reflection explicit and treating it as an optimization objective can substantially enhance the reliability of tool interaction, providing a reproducible pathway for agents to grow stronger by learning from failure. Our Code

问 Lune

尽管问,回答会引用原文。

Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。

可以从这些问题问起

Lune 的依据

全文 · 引用它的 1 篇顶会 Paper · 相关的 Paper

获取答案

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper1

  1. Robust Tool Use via Fission-GRPO: Learning to Recover from Execution ErrorsZhiwei Zhang, Fei Zhao, Rui Wang, Zezhong Wang 等ACL 2026 · 4 次引用

它引用的 Paper14

  1. DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan 等NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 次引用
  2. ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIsYujia Qin, Shihao Liang, Yining Ye, Kunlun Zhu 等ICLR 2024 · 1,469 次引用
  3. Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning YetJie Huang, Xinyun Chen, Swaroop Mishra, Huaixiu Steven Zheng 等ICLR 2024 · 858 次引用
  4. ReTool: Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Tool Use in LLMsJiazhan Feng, Shijue Huang, Xingwei Qu, Ge Zhang 等ICLR 2026 · 406 次引用
  5. ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning NeedsCheng Qian, Emre Can Acikgoz, Qi He, Hongru Wang 等NeurIPS 2025 · 387 次引用

相关 Paper

  1. Do LLMs Catch Their Own Mistakes? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Reflective Tool Use LLMsZheyuan Liu, Liqiang Xiao, Yang Li, Hyokun Yun 等ACL Findings 2026
  2. Advancing Tool-Augmented Large Language Models via Meta-Verification and Reflection LearningZhiyuan Ma, Jiayu Liu, Xianzhen Luo, Zhenya Huang 等KDD 2025 · 4 次引用
  3. ReActR: Reasoning through Error-Activated Reflection for LLM Post-TrainingLina SunACL 2026
  4. SAMULE: Self-Learning Agents Enhanced by Multi-level ReflectionYubin Ge, Salvatore Romeo, Jason Cai, Monica Sunkara 等EMNLP 2025
  5. GUI-Reflection: Empowering Multimodal GUI Models with Self-Reflection BehaviorPenghao Wu, Shengnan Ma, Bo Wang, Jiaheng Yu 等NeurIPS 2025 · 20 次引用
黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖