EMNLP Findings2025
Quantifying the Risks of LLM- and Tool-assisted Rephrasing to Linguistic Diversity
Mengying Wang, Andreas Spitz
摘要
Writing assistants and large language models see widespread use in the creation of text content. While their effectiveness for individual users has been evaluated in the literature, little is known about their proclivity to change language or reduce its richness when adopted by a large user base. In this paper, we take a first step towards quantifying this risk by measuring the semantic and vocabulary change enacted by the use of rephrasing tools on a multi-domain corpus of human-generated text.
问 Lune
尽管问,回答会引用原文。
Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。
它引用的 Paper2
- ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language RepresentationsZhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel 等ICLR 2020 · 7,418 次引用
- CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model CapabilitiesMina Lee, Percy Liang, Qian YangCHI 2022 · 340 次引用
相关 Paper
- The Impact of Large Language Models in Academia: from Writing to SpeakingMingmeng Geng, Caixi Chen, Yanru Wu, Yao Wan 等ACL Findings 2025 · 7 次引用
- Can You Make It Sound Like You? Post-Editing LLM-Generated Text for Personal StyleConnor Baumler, Calvin Bao, Huy Nghiem, Xinchen Yang 等ACL 2026 · 1 次引用
- NAP2: A Benchmark for Naturalness and Privacy-Preserving Text Rewriting by Learning from HumanShuo Huang, William MacLean, Xiaoxi Kang, Qiongkai Xu 等EMNLP Findings 2025
- Mind the Style Gap: Meta-Evaluation of Style and Attribute Transfer MetricsAmalie Brogaard Pauli, Isabelle Augenstein, Ira AssentEMNLP Findings 2025
- Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?Vishakh Padmakumar, He HeICLR 2024 · 173 次引用
