Synergy-of-Experts: Collaborate to Improve Adversarial Robustness
Sen Cui, Jingfeng Zhang, Jian Liang, Bo Han, Masashi Sugiyama, Changshui Zhang
摘要
Learning adversarially robust models requires invariant predictions to a small neighborhood of its natural inputs, often encountering insufficient model capacity. There is research showing that learning multiple sub-models in an ensemble could mitigate this insufficiency, further improving the generalization and the robustness. However, the ensemble's voting-based strategy excludes the possibility that the true predictions remain with the minority. Therefore, this paper further improves the ensemble through a collaboration scheme-Synergy-of-Experts (SoE). Compared with the voting-based strategy, the SoE enables the possibility of correct predictions even if there exists a single correct sub-model. In SoE, every sub-model fits its specific vulnerability area and reserves the rest of the sub-models to fit other vulnerability areas, which effectively optimizes the utilization of the model capacity. Empirical experiments verify that SoE outperforms various ensemble methods against white-box and transfer-based adversarial attacks. The source codes are available at https://github.com/cuis15/synergy-of-experts . * The first two authors have made equal contributions. Definition 1 (best-performing sub-model). Given an input x and its label y, the best-performing sub-model achieves the lowest objective loss on the data (x, y) among all M sub-models: Note that the best-performing sub-model is w.r.t. the input data (x, y), i.e., different input data correspond to different best-performing sub-models. Collaboration. Suppose that there are M learned sub-models f θ1 , f θ2 , ..., f θ M . Given an input x, sub-models make predictions f θ1 (x), f θ2 (x), ..., f θ M (x) . The collaboration tries to output a final prediction collaboration(x, f θ1 , ..., f θ M ) by the best-performing sub-model: collaboration(x, f θ1 , ..., f θ M ) = f θ best (x).
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- Understanding and Improving Ensemble Adversarial DefenseYian Deng, Tingting MuNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 37 次
- Robust Fraud Transaction Detection: A Two-Player Game ApproachQi Tan, Yi Zhao, Laizhong Cui, Qi Li 等NDSS 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper53
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 被引用 9,786 次
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 被引用 2,337 次
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 被引用 1,352 次
- Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential PrivacyMathias Lécuyer, Vaggelis Atlidakis, Roxana Geambasu, Daniel Hsu 等S&P 2019 · 被引用 1,022 次
- Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningLeslie Rice, Eric Wong, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 被引用 935 次
相关 Paper
- To Tackle Adversarial Transferability: A Novel Ensemble Training Method with Fourier TransformationWanlin Zhang, Weichen Lin, Ruomin Huang, Shihong Song 等ICLR 2025
- MORA: Improving Ensemble Robustness Evaluation with Model Reweighing AttackYunrui Yu, Xitong Gao, Cheng-Zhong XuNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 14 次
- Improving Ensemble Robustness by Collaboratively Promoting and Demoting Adversarial RobustnessTuan-Anh Bui, Trung Le, He Zhao, Paul Montague 等AAAI 2021 · 被引用 13 次
- DVERGE: Diversifying Vulnerabilities for Enhanced Robust Generation of EnsemblesHuanrui Yang, Jingyang Zhang, Hongliang Dong, Nathan Inkawhich 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 144 次
- Rethinking Model Ensemble in Transfer-based Adversarial AttacksHuanran Chen, Yichi Zhang, Yinpeng Dong, Xiao Yang 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 112 次
