Lune

ACL Findings2026

Large Reasoning Models Are (Not Yet) Multilingual Latent Reasoners

Yihong Liu, Raoyuan Zhao, Hinrich Schütze, Michael A. Hedderich

摘要

Large reasoning models (LRMs) achieve strong performance on mathematical reasoning tasks, often attributed to their capability to generate explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) explanations.However, recent work shows that LRMs often arrive at the correct answer before completing these textual reasoning steps, indicating the presence of latent reasoning -internal, non-verbal computation encoded in hidden states.While this phenomenon has been explored in English, its multilingual behavior remains largely unknown.In this paper, we conduct a systematic investigation of multilingual latent reasoning in LRMs across 11 languages.Using a truncation-based strategy, we examine how the correct answer emerges as the model is given only partial reasoning traces, allowing us to measure stepwise latent prediction formation.Our results reveal clear evidence of multilingual latent reasoning, though unevenly: strong in resource-rich languages, weaker in low-resource ones, and broadly less observable on harder benchmarks.To understand whether these differences reflect distinct internal mechanisms, we further perform representational analyses.Despite surface-level disparities, we find that the internal evolution of predictions is highly consistent across languages and broadly aligns with English -a pattern suggesting an English-centered latent reasoning pathway. 1 * Equal contribution.† Equal advising.1 We make our code publicly available at: https:// github.com/cisnlp/multilingual-latent-reasoner

问 Lune

尽管问,回答会引用原文。

Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。

可以从这些问题问起

Lune 的依据

全文 · 引用它的 2 篇顶会 Paper · 相关的 Paper

获取答案

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper2

  1. Is it Thinking or Cheating? Detecting Implicit Reward Hacking by Measuring Reasoning EffortXinpeng Wang, Nitish Joshi, Barbara Plank, Rico Angell 等ICLR 2026 · 27 次引用
  2. Evaluating Robustness of Large Language Models Against Multilingual Typographical ErrorsRaoyuan Zhao, Yihong Liu, Lena Altinger, Hinrich Schütze 等ACL 2026 · 6 次引用

它引用的 Paper34

  1. Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 次引用
  2. Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?Zhiqi Chen, Rui Lu, Andrew Zhao, Zhaokai Wang 等NeurIPS 2025 · 1,109 次引用
  3. Medusa: Simple LLM Inference Acceleration Framework with Multiple Decoding HeadsTianle Cai, Yuhong Li, Zhengyang Geng, Hongwu Peng 等ICML 2024 · 669 次引用
  4. Why think step by step? Reasoning emerges from the locality of experienceBen Prystawski, Michael Li, Noah D. GoodmanNeurIPS 2023 · 168 次引用
  5. Linearity of Relation Decoding in Transformer Language ModelsEvan Hernandez, Arnab Sen Sharma, Tal Haklay, Kevin Meng 等ICLR 2024 · 163 次引用

相关 Paper

  1. Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Across LanguagesJosh Barua, Seun Eisape, Kayo Yin, Alane SuhrICLR 2026 · 21 次引用
  2. mCoT: Multilingual Instruction Tuning for Reasoning Consistency in Language ModelsHuiyuan Lai, Malvina NissimACL 2024 · 5 次引用
  3. Reasoning Transfer for an Extremely Low-Resource and Endangered Language: Bridging Languages Through Sample-Efficient Language UnderstandingKhanh-Tung Tran, Barry O'Sullivan, Hoang D. NguyenAAAI 2026 · 4 次引用
  4. When Models Reason in Your Language: Controlling Thinking Language Comes at the Cost of AccuracyJirui Qi, Shan Chen, Zidi Xiong, Raquel Fernández 等EMNLP Findings 2025
  5. When Less Language is More: Language-Reasoning Disentanglement Makes LLMs Better Multilingual ReasonersWeixiang Zhao, Jiahe Guo, Yang Deng, Tongtong Wu 等NeurIPS 2025 · 20 次引用
黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖