ACL Findings2026
Probabilistic Depression Detection from Textual Time Series
Fabian Schmidt, Seyedehmoniba Ravan, Vladimir Vlassov
摘要
Accurate and interpretable predictions of depression severity are essential for clinical decision support, yet existing models often lack uncertainty estimates and temporal interpretability. We propose PTTSD, a Probabilistic framework for Depression Detection from clinical interview utterance sequences that predicts PHQ-8 scores while modeling calibrated uncertainty. PTTSD includes sequence-to-sequence and sequence-to-one variants, both combining LSTMs, self-attention, and residual connections with Gaussian or Student's-t output heads trained via negative log-likelihood. The sequence-to-sequence variant enables temporal analysis of how predictive confidence evolves over an interview, despite the target being a single session-level score. Evaluated on E-DAIC and DAIC-WOZ, PTTSD achieves competitive performance among text-only systems (e.g., MAE = 3.85 on E-DAIC, 3.55 on DAIC) and produces well-calibrated prediction intervals. Ablations confirm the value of attention and probabilistic modeling, while a three-part calibration analysis and qualitative case studies highlight the clinical relevance of uncertaintyaware prediction. E-DAIC E-DAIC seq-to-one (MentalBERT) vs. seq-to-seq (MentalBERT) MAE 4.18 4.20 -0.594 0.591 ns E-DAIC seq-to-one (MentalBERT) vs. seq-to-one (MiniLM) MAE 4.18 4.58 -1.379 0.300 ns E-DAIC seq-to-one (MentalBERT) vs. seq-to-seq (MiniLM) MAE 4.18 3.85 +8.927 0.001 * * E-DAIC seq-to-seq (MentalBERT) vs. seq-to-one (MiniLM) MAE 4.20 4.58 -1.314 0.319 ns E-DAIC seq-to-seq (MentalBERT) vs. seq-to-seq (MiniLM) MAE 4.20 3.85 +12.124 <0.001 * * * E-DAIC seq-to-one (MiniLM) vs. seq-to-seq (MiniLM) MAE 4.58 3.85 +2.521 0.126 ns E-DAIC seq-to-one (MentalBERT) vs. seq-to-seq (MentalBERT) RMSE 5.23 5.39 -1.816 0.158 ns E-DAIC seq-to-one (MentalBERT) vs. seq-to-one (MiniLM) RMSE 5.23 5.87 -1.193 0.351 ns E-DAIC seq-to-one (MentalBERT) vs. seq-to-seq (MiniLM) RMSE 5.23 4.52 +3.062 0.071 † E-DAIC seq-to-seq (MentalBERT) vs. seq-to-one (MiniLM) RMSE 5.39 5.87 -0.900 0.462 ns E-DAIC seq-to-seq (MentalBERT) vs. seq-to-seq (MiniLM) RMSE 5.39 4.52 +3.880 0.053 † E-DAIC seq-to-one (MiniLM) vs. seq-to-seq (MiniLM) RMSE 5.87 4.52 +2.349 0.111 ns
问 Lune
尽管问,回答会引用原文。
Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。
它引用的 Paper1
相关 Paper
- Mitigating Interviewer Bias in Multimodal Depression Detection: An Approach with Adversarial Learning and Contextual Positional EncodingEnshi Zhang, Christian PoellabauerEMNLP Findings 2025
- SpeechT-RAG: Reliable Depression Detection in LLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Generation Using Speech Timing InformationXiangyu Zhang, Hexin Liu, Qiquan Zhang, Beena Ahmed 等ACL Findings 2025 · 3 次引用
- Rethinking Depression Prediction from a Fine-Grained Subscore Modeling Perspective via Multi-Task LearningZhenguang Wang, Bo Li, Wenhui Tan, Peng Cao 等ACL 2026
- Explainable Depression Detection in Clinical Interviews with Personalized Retrieval-Augmented GenerationLinhai Zhang, Ziyang Gao, Deyu Zhou, Yulan HeACL Findings 2025 · 9 次引用
- Predicting Depression in Screening Interviews from Interactive Multi-Theme CollaborationXianbing Zhao, Yiqing Lyu, Di Wang, Buzhou TangACL Findings 2025 · 2 次引用
