Effects of Structural Reward Shaping on Biophysical Properties in RL-Trained Plasmid Generators

We compare the efficacy and distributional effects of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) post-training for PlasmidGPT, a foundation model for whole-plasmid generation, using Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) for the RL model. Using a biologically motivated reward function encoding functional annotations, length constraints, and repeat penalties, the RL model achieves a 71.6% quality-control pass rate across 8 prompts on 4,000 sequences, compared to 4.3% for the pretrained baseline and 11.0% for SFT. A five-model reward ablation identifies the cassette arrangement bonus, which rewards correct promoter→CDS→terminator ordering, as the critical reward component. Rejectionsampling baselines indicate that the gain is not recovered by sampling more heavily from the base model. Beyond directly optimized features, RLgenerated sequences converge toward real plasmid distributions in 3-mer composition and minimum free energy density, neither of which is directly optimized by the reward function. Minimum free energy density independently converges to the real-plasmid regime under both SFT and RL despite these being parallel post-training paths. On a small curated hold-out set, RL improves continuation log-likelihood over the pretrained baseline on all 29 held-out sequences (mean ∆ = +0.83 nats).