CCS2017

HACL*: A Verified Modern Cryptographic Library

Jean Karim Zinzindohoué, Karthikeyan Bhargavan, Jonathan Protzenko, Benjamin Beurdouche

被引用 258 次

摘要

HACL * is a verified portable C cryptographic library that implements modern cryptographic primitives such as the ChaCha20 and Salsa20 encryption algorithms, Poly1305 and HMAC message authentication, SHA-256 and SHA-512 hash functions, the Curve25519 elliptic curve, and Ed25519 signatures. HACL * is written in the F * programming language and then compiled to readable C code. The F * source code for each cryptographic primitive is verified for memory safety, mitigations against timing side-channels, and functional correctness with respect to a succinct high-level specification of the primitive derived from its published standard. The translation from F * to C preserves these properties and the generated C code can itself be compiled via the CompCert verified C compiler or mainstream compilers like GCC or CLANG. When compiled with GCC on 64-bit platforms, our primitives are as fast as the fastest pure C implementations in OpenSSL and Libsodium, significantly faster than the reference C code in TweetNaCl, and between 1.1x-5.7x slower than the fastest hand-optimized vectorized assembly code in SUPERCOP. HACL * implements the NaCl cryptographic API and can be used as a drop-in replacement for NaCl libraries like Libsodium and TweetNaCl. HACL * provides the cryptographic components for a new mandatory ciphersuite in TLS 1.3 and is being developed as the main cryptographic provider for the miTLS verified implementation. Primitives from HACL * are also being integrated within Mozilla's NSS cryptographic library. Our results show that writing fast, verified, and usable C cryptographic libraries is now practical. THE NEED FOR VERIFIED CRYPTO Cryptographic libraries lie at the heart of the trusted computing base of the Internet, and consequently, they are held to a higher standard of correctness, robustness, and security than other distributed applications. Even minor bugs in cryptographic code typically result in CVEs and software updates. For instance, since 2016, OpenSSL has issued 11 CVEs 1 for bugs in its core cryptographic primitives, including 6 memory safety errors, 3 timing side-channel leaks, and 2 incorrect bignum computations. Such flaws may seem difficult to exploit at first, but as Brumley et al. [24] demonstrated, even an innocuous looking arithmetic bug hiding deep inside an elliptic