Detecting Misbehaviors of Large Vision-Language Models by Evidential Uncertainty Quantification
Tao Huang, Rui Wang, Xiaofei Liu, Yi Qin, Li Duan, Liping Jing
摘要
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have achieved substantial advances in multimodal understanding. However, when presented with blackchallenging or distribution-shifted inputs, they frequently produce unreliable or even harmful content, blacksuch as hallucinations or toxic responses. We refer to such misalignments with human expectations as misbehaviors of LVLMs, which raise serious concerns for their deployment in critical applications. blackExisting research have disclosed that such misbehaviors are closely linked to model uncertainty. We find they primarily stem from two distinct sources of epistemic uncertainty: internal contradictions (conflict) and the absence of supporting information (ignorance). While existing uncertainty quantification methods typically capture only total predictive uncertainty, they struggle to distinguish between these underlying causes. To address this gap, we propose Evidential Uncertainty Quantification (EUQ), blacka training-free framework that explicitly decomposes epistemic uncertainty into conflict (CF) and ignorance (IG). Specifically, we interpret features from the model output head as either supporting (positive) or opposing (negative) evidence. Leveraging Dempster-Shafer Theory of belief functions, we aggregate this evidence to quantify internal conflict and knowledge gaps within a single forward pass. We extensively evaluate EUQ across four misbehavior categories, including hallucinations, jailbreaks, adversarial vulnerabilities, and out-of-distribution (OOD) failures using state-of-the-art LVLMs. Experimental results demonstrate that EUQ consistently outperforms strong baselines, blackachieving relative improvements of up to 10.5% in AUROC. blackOur evaluation further reveals that hallucinations correspond to high internal conflict and OOD failures to high ignorance. blackFurthermore, a layer-wise evidential uncertainty dynamics analysis provides a novel perspective on the evolution of internal representations. The source code is available at https://github.com/HT86159/EUQ.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper38
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh 等ICML 2021 · 被引用 47,906 次
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 8,168 次
- Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMsMiao Xiong, Zhiyuan Hu, Xinyang Lu, Yifei Li 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 867 次
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le 等ICLR 2023 · 被引用 681 次
- nocaps: novel object captioning at scaleHarsh Agrawal, Peter Anderson, Karan Desai, Yufei Wang 等ICCV 2019 · 被引用 631 次
相关 Paper
- Not All Inconsistency Is Equal: Decomposing LVLM Uncertainty into Belief Divergence and Belief ConflictJie Shi, Xiaodong Yue, Wei Liu, Yufei Chen 等AAAI 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- On Epistemic Uncertainty of Visual Tokens for Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language ModelsHoigi Seo, Dong Un Kang, Hyunjin Cho, Joohoon Lee 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 4 次
- To Believe or Not to Believe Your LLM: Iterative Prompting for Estimating Epistemic UncertaintyYasin Abbasi-Yadkori, Ilja Kuzborskij, András György, Csaba SzepesváriNeurIPS 2024
- Enhancing Vision-Language Model Reliability with Uncertainty-Guided Dropout DecodingYixiong Fang, Ziran Yang, Zhaorun Chen, Zhuokai Zhao 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 21 次
- A Head to Predict and a Head to Question: Pre-trained Uncertainty Quantification Heads for Hallucination Detection in LLM OutputsArtem Shelmanov, Ekaterina Fadeeva, Akim Tsvigun, Ivan Tsvigun 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 3 次
