Lune

EMNLP Findings2023

INVITE: a Testbed of Automatically Generated Invalid Questions to Evaluate Large Language Models for Hallucinations

Anil Ramakrishna, Rahul Gupta, Jens Lehmann, Morteza Ziyadi

摘要

Recent advancements in Large language models (LLMs) have enabled them to hold free form conversations over multiple turns, but they exhibit a tendency to make unfounded and incorrect statements, commonly known as hallucinations. In particular, LLMs hallucinate frequently when given invalid questions, i.e. ones with incorrect assumptions. The most common approach to evaluate LLMs on hallucinations is to test them on Question Answering (QA) test sets such as TruthfulQA. However, LLMs are increasingly pretrained on massive text corpora scraped from the Internet, which may inevitably expose these test sets to the model during training, leading eventually to an overestimation of model performances on these test sets. In this work, we present an alternative framework to address this risk and to foster further research towards making LLMs robust against invalid questions. We name our framework INVITE: a testbed of automatically generated INValId questions to evaluaTE large language models for hallucinations. In each instantiation, our framework is set up to create a fresh batch of invalid questions by distorting valid facts in which subjects or objects are replaced by similar entities. We evaluate several state of the art LLMs against a testset generated by our framework and highlight its capacity to trigger hallucinations in these models.

问 Lune

尽管问,回答会引用原文。

Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。

可以从这些问题问起

Lune 的依据

全文 · 引用它的 3 篇顶会 Paper · 相关的 Paper

获取答案

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper3

  1. An Audit on the Perspectives and Challenges of Hallucinations in NLPPranav Narayanan Venkit, Tatiana Chakravorti, Vipul Gupta, Heidi Biggs 等EMNLP 2024 · 8 次引用
  2. Whispers that Shake Foundations: Analyzing and Mitigating False Premise Hallucinations in Large Language ModelsHongbang Yuan, Pengfei Cao, Zhuoran Jin, Yubo Chen 等EMNLP 2024 · 5 次引用
  3. FaithEval: Can Your Language Model Stay Faithful to Context, Even If "The Moon is Made of Marshmallows"Yifei Ming, Senthil Purushwalkam, Shrey Pandit, Zixuan Ke 等ICLR 2025

它引用的 Paper7

  1. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 次引用
  2. BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger 等ICLR 2020 · 8,443 次引用
  3. TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 次引用
  4. Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Daphne Ippolito, Matthew Jagielski, Katherine Lee 等ICLR 2023 · 158 次引用
  5. CodeT: Code Generation with Generated TestsBei Chen, Fengji Zhang, Anh Nguyen, Daoguang Zan 等ICLR 2023 · 64 次引用

相关 Paper

  1. Identifying and Answering Questions with False Assumptions: An Interpretable ApproachZijie Wang, Eduardo BlancoEMNLP 2025
  2. The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language ModelsJunyi Li, Jie Chen, Ruiyang Ren, Xiaoxue Cheng 等ACL 2024 · 49 次引用
  3. A New Benchmark and Reverse Validation Method for Passage-level Hallucination DetectionShiping Yang, Renliang Sun, Xiaojun WanEMNLP Findings 2023 · 25 次引用
  4. Detecting and Reducing the Factual Hallucinations of Large Language Models with Metamorphic TestingWeibin Wu, Yuhang Cao, Ning Yi, Rongyi Ou 等FSE 2025 · 5 次引用
  5. Reference-free Hallucination Detection for Large Vision-Language ModelsQing Li, Jiahui Geng, Chenyang Lyu, Derui Zhu 等EMNLP Findings 2024 · 16 次引用
黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖