EMNLP Findings2023
HANSEN: Human and AI Spoken Text Benchmark for Authorship Analysis
Nafis Irtiza Tripto, Adaku Uchendu, Thai Le, Mattia Setzu, Fosca Giannotti, Dongwon Lee
摘要
Authorship Analysis, also known as stylometry, has been an essential aspect of Natural Language Processing (NLP) for a long time. Likewise, the recent advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has made authorship analysis increasingly crucial for distinguishing between human-written and AI-generated texts. However, these authorship analysis tasks have primarily been focused on written texts, not considering spoken texts. Thus, we introduce the largest benchmark for spoken texts - HANSEN (Human ANd ai Spoken tExt beNchmark). HANSEN encompasses meticulous curation of existing speech datasets accompanied by transcripts, alongside the creation of novel AI-generated spoken text datasets. Together, it comprises 17 human datasets, and AI-generated spoken texts created using 3 prominent LLMs: ChatGPT, PaLM2, and Vicuna13B. To evaluate and demonstrate the utility of HANSEN, we perform Authorship Attribution (AA) & Author Verification (AV) on human-spoken datasets and conducted Human vs. AI spoken text detection using state-of-the-art (SOTA) models. While SOTA methods, such as, character ngram or Transformer-based model, exhibit similar AA & AV performance in human-spoken datasets compared to written ones, there is much room for improvement in AI-generated spoken text detection. The HANSEN benchmark is available at: https://huggingface.co/datasets/HANSEN-REPO/HANSEN.
问 Lune
尽管问,回答会引用原文。
Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。
引用它的顶会 Paper6
- Beyond Binary: Towards Fine-Grained LLM-Generated Text Detection via Role Recognition and Involvement MeasurementZihao Cheng, Li Zhou, Feng Jiang, Benyou Wang 等WWW 2025 · 20 次引用
- Paladin: Defending LLM-enabled Phishing Emails with a New Trigger-Tag ParadigmYan Pang, Wenlong Meng, Xiaojing Liao, Tianhao WangNDSS 2026 · 5 次引用
- Beyond Checkmate: Exploring the Creative Choke Points for AI Generated TextsNafis Irtiza Tripto, Saranya Venkatraman, Mahjabin Nahar, Dongwon LeeEMNLP 2025 · 1 次引用
- When Misinformation Speaks and Converses: Rethinking Fact-Checking in Audio PlatformsChaewan Chun, Delvin Ce Zhang, Dongwon LeeACL 2026
- SCAR: Data Selection via Style Consistency-Aware Response Ranking for Efficient Instruction-Tuning of Large Language ModelsZhuang Li, Yuncheng Hua, Thuy-Trang Vu, Haolan Zhan 等ACL 2025
它引用的 Paper12
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 次引用
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger 等ICLR 2020 · 8,443 次引用
- DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning 等ICML 2023 · 988 次引用
- A Watermark for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz 等ICML 2023 · 854 次引用
- MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence FrontiersKrishna Pillutla, Swabha Swayamdipta, Rowan Zellers, John Thickstun 等NeurIPS 2021 · 606 次引用
相关 Paper
- TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text GenerationAdaku Uchendu, Zeyu Ma, Thai Le, Rui Zhang 等EMNLP Findings 2021 · 82 次引用
- OpenTuringBench: An Open-Model-based Benchmark and Framework for Machine-Generated Text Detection and AttributionLucio La Cava, Andrea TagarelliEMNLP 2025
- MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text DetectionXinlei He, Xinyue Shen, Zeyuan Chen, Michael Backes 等CCS 2024 · 30 次引用
- MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the WildYafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi 等ACL 2024 · 44 次引用
- The Two Paradigms of LLM Detection: Authorship Attribution vs Authorship VerificationJanek Bevendorff, Matti Wiegmann, Emmelie Richter, Martin Potthast 等ACL Findings 2025 · 6 次引用
