Lune

EMNLP Findings2025

Automated Creativity Evaluation for Large Language Models: A Reference-Based Approach

Ruizhe Li, Chiwei Zhu, Benfeng Xu, Xiaorui Wang, Zhendong Mao

摘要

Creative writing is a key capability of Large Language Models (LLMs), with potential applications in literature, storytelling, and various creative domains. However, evaluating the creativity of machine-generated texts remains a significant challenge, as existing methods either rely on costly manual annotations or fail to align closely with human assessments. In this paper, we propose an effective automated evaluation method based on the Torrance Test of Creative Writing (TTCW), which evaluates creativity as product. Our method employs a reference-based Likert-style approach, scoring generated creative texts relative to high-quality reference texts across various tests. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly improves the alignment between LLM evaluations and human assessments, achieving a pairwise accuracy of 0.75 (+15%).

问 Lune

尽管问,回答会引用原文。

Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。

可以从这些问题问起

Lune 的依据

全文 · 引用它的 6 篇顶会 Paper · 相关的 Paper

获取答案

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper6

  1. WebDevJudge: Evaluating (M)LLMs as Critiques for Web Development QualityChunyang Li, Yilun Zheng, Xinting Huang, Tianqing Fang 等ICLR 2026 · 14 次引用
  2. Evaluating Text Creativity across Diverse Domains: a Dataset and Large Language Model EvaluatorQian Cao, Xiting Wang, Yuzhuo Yuan, Yahui Liu 等ICLR 2026 · 11 次引用
  3. Measuring LLM Novelty As The Frontier Of Original And High-Quality OutputVishakh Padmakumar, Chen Yueh-Han, Jane Pan, Valerie Chen 等ICLR 2026 · 6 次引用
  4. DEFINED: A Data-Efficient Computational Framework for Fine-Grained Creativity Assessment in Debate ScenariosTongzhou Yu, Mingjia Li, Hong Qian, Wenkai Wang 等KDD 2026 · 1 次引用
  5. TRACE: A Corpus of Team Creative DiscussionsYixuan Jiang, Tiancheng Hu, José Hernández-Orallo, David Stillwell 等ACL 2026

它引用的 Paper7

  1. BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger 等ICLR 2020 · 8,443 次引用
  2. BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,143 次引用
  3. Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language ModelsMrinank Sharma, Meg Tong, Tomasz Korbak, David Duvenaud 等ICLR 2024 · 762 次引用
  4. Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written EvaluationsEthan Perez, Sam Ringer, Kamile Lukosiute, Karina Nguyen 等ACL Findings 2023 · 195 次引用
  5. Art or Artifice? Large Language Models and the False Promise of CreativityTuhin Chakrabarty, Philippe Laban, Divyansh Agarwal, Smaranda Muresan 等CHI 2024 · 122 次引用

相关 Paper

  1. Evaluation of Text-to-Image Generation from a Creativity PerspectiveXinhao Wang, Xinyu Ma, Shengyong Ding, Derek F. WongEMNLP Findings 2025 · 1 次引用
  2. Evaluating the Creativity of LLMs in Persian Literary Text GenerationArmin Tourajmehr, Mohammad Reza Modarres, Yadollah YaghoobzadehEMNLP Findings 2025
  3. ExPerT: Effective and Explainable Evaluation of Personalized Long-Form Text GenerationAlireza Salemi, Julian Killingback, Hamed ZamaniACL Findings 2025 · 6 次引用
  4. Systematic Task Exploration with LLMs: A Study in Citation Text GenerationFurkan Sahinuç, Ilia Kuznetsov, Yufang Hou, Iryna GurevychACL 2024
  5. Automated Creativity Evaluation of Language Models Across Open-Ended TasksTan Min Sen, Zachary Choy Kit Chun, Syed Ali Redha Alsagoff, Nadya Yuki Wangsajaya 等ACL 2026
黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖