Lune

ACL Findings2024

Chaos with Keywords: Exposing Large Language Models Sycophancy to Misleading Keywords and Evaluating Defense Strategies

Aswin RRV, Nemika Tyagi, Md Nayem Uddin, Neeraj Varshney, Chitta Baral

摘要

This study explores the sycophantic tendencies of Large Language Models (LLMs), where these models tend to provide answers that match what users want to hear, even if they are not entirely correct. The motivation behind this exploration stems from the common behavior observed in individuals searching the internet for facts with partial or misleading knowledge. Similar to using web search engines, users may recall fragments of misleading keywords and submit them to an LLM, hoping for a comprehensive response. Our empirical analysis of several LLMs shows the potential danger of these models amplifying misinformation when presented with misleading keywords. Additionally, we thoroughly assess four existing hallucination mitigation strategies to reduce LLMs sycophantic behavior. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of these strategies for generating factually correct statements. Furthermore, our analyses delve into knowledgeprobing experiments on factual keywords and different categories of sycophancy mitigation.

问 Lune

尽管问,回答会引用原文。

Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。

可以从这些问题问起

Lune 的依据

全文 · 引用它的 8 篇顶会 Paper · 相关的 Paper

获取答案

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper8

  1. BrokenMath: A Benchmark for Sycophancy in Theorem Proving with LLMsIvo Petrov, Jasper Dekoninck, Martin VechevICML 2026 · 25 次引用
  2. Flattery in Motion: Benchmarking and Analyzing Sycophancy in Video-LLMsWenrui Zhou, Mohamed Hendy, Shu Yang, Qingsong Yang 等ACL 2026 · 21 次引用
  3. How RLHF Amplifies SycophancyItai Shapira, Gerdus Benade, Ariel ProcacciaICML 2026 · 16 次引用
  4. Cancer-Myth: Evaluating Large Language Models on Patient Questions with False PresuppositionsWang Zhu, Tianqi Chen, Xinyan Yu, Ching Ying Lin 等ICLR 2026 · 15 次引用
  5. When Identity Skews Debate: Anonymization for Bias-Reduced Multi-Agent ReasoningHyeong Kyu Choi, Xiaojin (Jerry) Zhu, Sharon LiACL 2026 · 12 次引用

它引用的 Paper17

  1. Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 次引用
  2. Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu 等ICLR 2022 · 4,966 次引用
  3. TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 次引用
  4. Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP TasksYizhong Wang, Swaroop Mishra, Pegah Alipoormolabashi, Yeganeh Kordi 等EMNLP 2022 · 238 次引用
  5. When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric MemoriesAlex Mallen, Akari Asai, Victor Zhong, Rajarshi Das 等ACL 2023 · 233 次引用

相关 Paper

  1. The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language ModelsJunyi Li, Jie Chen, Ruiyang Ren, Xiaoxue Cheng 等ACL 2024 · 49 次引用
  2. Trust Me, I'm Wrong: LLMs Hallucinate with Certainty Despite Knowing the AnswerAdi Simhi, Itay Itzhak, Fazl Barez, Gabriel Stanovsky 等EMNLP Findings 2025 · 8 次引用
  3. On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language ModelsYikang Pan, Liangming Pan, Wenhu Chen, Preslav Nakov 等EMNLP Findings 2023 · 85 次引用
  4. Exploring the Impact of Instruction-Tuning on LLM's Susceptibility to MisinformationKyubeen Han, Junseo Jang, Hongjin Kim, Geunyeong Jeong 等ACL 2025
  5. How Much Do LLMs Hallucinate across Languages? On Realistic Multilingual Estimation of LLM HallucinationSaad Obaid ul Islam, Anne Lauscher, Goran GlavasEMNLP 2025
黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖