Optimal Thompson Sampling strategies for support-aware CVaR bandits
Dorian Baudry, Romain Gautron, Emilie Kaufmann, Odalric Maillard
摘要
In this paper we study a multi-arm bandit problem in which the quality of each arm is measured by the Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) at some level α of the reward distribution. While existing works in this setting mainly focus on Upper Confidence Bound algorithms, we introduce a new Thompson Sampling approach for CVaR bandits on bounded rewards that is flexible enough to solve a variety of problems grounded on physical resources. Building on a recent work by Riou and Honda (2020), we introduce B-CVTS for continuous bounded rewards and M-CVTS for multinomial distributions. On the theoretical side, we provide a non-trivial extension of their analysis that enables to theoretically bound their CVaR regret minimization performance. Strikingly, our results show that these strategies are the first to provably achieve asymptotic optimality in CVaR bandits, matching the corresponding asymptotic lower bounds for this setting. Further, we illustrate empirically the benefit of Thompson Sampling approaches both in a realistic environment simulating a use-case in agriculture and on various synthetic examples. weak moment conditions: In (Carpentier and Valko, 2014) , the authors study regret minimization for extreme statistics (the maximum), for Weibull of Frechet-like distributions. In (Lattimore, 2017), a median-of-mean estimator is studied to minimize regret for distributions with bounded kurtosis. A CVaR strategy has been proposed for the different pure exploration setting (Kagrecha et al., 2019; Agrawal et al., 2020) , under weak moment conditions. These works consider a different setup and objective. Contributions In this paper, we purposely focus on minimizing the CVaR regret considering either distributions with discrete, finite support, or with continuous and bounded support, as we believe this has great practical relevance and is still a relatively unexplored topic in the literature. More precisely, we target first-order asymptotic optimality for these (sometimes called "non-parametric") families and first derive in Theorem 1 a lower-bound on the CVaR regret, adapting that of (Lai and Robbins, 1985; Burnetas and Katehakis, 1996) to the CVaR criterion. This simple result highlights the right complexity term that should appear when deriving regret upper bounds. We then introduce in Section 2 B-CVTS for CVaR bandits with bounded support, and M-CVTS for CVaR bandits with multinomial arms, adapting the strategies proposed by Riou and Honda (2020) for the CVaR. We provide in Theorem 2 and Theorem 3 the regret bound of each algorithm, proving asymptotic optimality of these strategies. Up to our knowledge, these are the first results showing asymptotic optimality of a Thompson Sampling based CVaR regret minimization strategy. As expected, adapting the regret analysis from Riou and Honda (2020) is non-trivial; we highlight the main challenges of this adaption in section 3.3. For instance, one of the key challenge was to handle boundary crossing probability for the CVaR, and another difficulty comes in the analysis of the non-parametric B-CVTS due to regularity properties of the Kulback-Leibler projection. In Section 4, we provide a case study in agriculture, making the well-established DSSAT agriculture simulator (Hoogenboom et al., 2019) available to the bandit community, and highlight the benefits of using strategies based on Thompson Sampling in this CVaR bandit setting against state-of-the-art baselines: We compare to U-UCB and CVaR-UCB 2 as they showcase two fundamentally different approaches to build a UCB strategy for a non-linear utility function. The first one is closely related to UCB, the second one exploits properties of the underlying CDF, which may generalize to different risk metrics. As claimed in Tamkin et al. (2020), our experiments confirm that CVaR-UCB generally performs better than U-UCB. However, both TS strategies outperform UCB algorithms that tend to suffer from non-optimized confidence bounds. We complete this study with more classical experiments on 2 MaRaB is similar to U-UCB but enjoys weaker guarantees. synthetic data that also confirm the benefit of TS. Thompson Sampling Algorithms We present two novel algorithms based on Thompson Sampling and targeting the lower bound of Theorem 1 on the CVaR-regret, for any specified value of α ∈ (0, 1]. These algorithms are inspired by the first algorithms based on Thompson Sampling matching the Burnetas and Katehakis lower bound for bounded distributions in the expectation setting, recently proposed by Riou and Honda (2020).
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper13
- Top Two Algorithms RevisitedMarc Jourdan, Rémy Degenne, Dorian Baudry, Rianne de Heide 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 57 次
- A Unifying Theory of Thompson Sampling for Continuous Risk-Averse BanditsJoel Q. L. Chang, Vincent Y. F. TanAAAI 2022 · 被引用 18 次
- Optimistic Posterior Sampling for Reinforcement Learning with Few Samples and Tight GuaranteesDaniil Tiapkin, Denis Belomestny, Daniele Calandriello, Eric Moulines 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 16 次
- From Optimality to Robustness: Adaptive Re-Sampling Strategies in Stochastic BanditsDorian Baudry, Patrick Saux, Odalric-Ambrym MaillardNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 9 次
- Stochastic Multi-armed Bandits: Optimal Trade-off among Optimality, Consistency, and Tail RiskDavid Simchi-Levi, Zeyu Zheng, Feng ZhuNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 8 次
它引用的顶会 Paper1
相关 Paper
- Optimizing Conditional Value-At-Risk of Black-Box FunctionsQuoc Phong Nguyen, Zhongxiang Dai, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low, Patrick JailletNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 25 次
- Concentration bounds for CVaR estimation: The cases of light-tailed and heavy-tailed distributionsPrashanth L. A., Krishna P. Jagannathan, Ravi Kumar KollaICML 2020 · 被引用 53 次
- Thompson Sampling Algorithms for Mean-Variance BanditsQiuyu Zhu, Vincent Y. F. TanICML 2020 · 被引用 57 次
- Distributionally-Aware Kernelized Bandit Problems for Risk AversionSho TakemoriICML 2022
- Near-Minimax-Optimal Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning with CVaRKaiwen Wang, Nathan Kallus, Wen SunICML 2023 · 被引用 36 次
