On the Relation between Sensitivity and Accuracy in In-Context Learning

In-context learning (ICL) suffers from oversensitivity to the prompt, making it unreliable in real-world scenarios. We study the sensitivity of ICL with respect to multiple perturbation types. First, we find that label bias obscures the true sensitivity, and therefore prior work may have significantly underestimated ICL sensitivity. Second, we observe a strong negative correlation between ICL sensitivity and accuracy: predictions sensitive to perturbations are less likely to be correct. Motivated by these findings, we propose SENSEL, a few-shot selective prediction method that abstains from sensitive predictions. Experiments on ten classification datasets show that SENSEL consistently outperforms two commonly used confidence-based and entropy-based baselines on abstention decisions.