Lune

EMNLP Findings2020

Gradient-based Analysis of NLP Models is Manipulable

Junlin Wang, Jens Tuyls, Eric Wallace, Sameer Singh

摘要

Gradient-based analysis methods, such as saliency map visualizations and adversarial input perturbations, have found widespread use in interpreting neural NLP models due to their simplicity, flexibility, and most importantly, their faithfulness.In this paper, however, we demonstrate that the gradients of a model are easily manipulable, and thus bring into question the reliability of gradient-based analyses.In particular, we merge the layers of a target model with a FACADE model that overwhelms the gradients without affecting the predictions.This FACADE model can be trained to have gradients that are misleading and irrelevant to the task, such as focusing only on the stop words in the input.On a variety of NLP tasks (text classification, NLI, and QA), we show that our method can manipulate numerous gradient-based analysis techniques: saliency maps, input reduction, and adversarial perturbations all identify unimportant or targeted tokens as being highly important.The code and a tutorial of this paper is available at http://ucinlp.github.io/facade.Input Prediction P(+)=0.9How !great Gradient How great !(a) Original Model, forig Prediction P(+)=0.5 Gradient How great !Input How !great (b) FACADE Model, g 1024 Input Prediction P(+)=0.9Gradient How great !

问 Lune

尽管问,回答会引用原文。

Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。

可以从这些问题问起

Lune 的依据

全文 · 引用它的 13 篇顶会 Paper · 相关的 Paper

获取答案

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper13

  1. Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in ExplainabilityDylan Slack, Anna Hilgard, Sameer Singh, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2021 · 240 次引用
  2. Counterfactual Explanations Can Be ManipulatedDylan Slack, Anna Hilgard, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Sameer SinghNeurIPS 2021 · 182 次引用
  3. VALSE: A Task-Independent Benchmark for Vision and Language Models Centered on Linguistic PhenomenaLetitia Parcalabescu, Michele Cafagna, Lilitta Muradjan, Anette Frank 等ACL 2022 · 147 次引用
  4. Framework for Evaluating Faithfulness of Local ExplanationsSanjoy Dasgupta, Nave Frost, Michal MoshkovitzICML 2022 · 87 次引用
  5. SoK: Explainable Machine Learning in Adversarial EnvironmentsMaximilian Noppel, Christian WressneggerS&P 2024 · 28 次引用

它引用的 Paper3

  1. Interpretations are Useful: Penalizing Explanations to Align Neural Networks with Prior KnowledgeLaura Rieger, Chandan Singh, W. James Murdoch, Bin YuICML 2020 · 249 次引用
  2. Fooling Network Interpretation in Image ClassificationAkshayvarun Subramanya, Vipin Pillai, Hamed PirsiavashICCV 2019 · 68 次引用
  3. Learning to Deceive with Attention-Based ExplanationsDanish Pruthi, Mansi Gupta, Bhuwan Dhingra, Graham Neubig 等ACL 2020 · 17 次引用

相关 Paper

  1. DANCE: Enhancing saliency maps using decoysYang Young Lu, Wenbo Guo, Xinyu Xing, William Stafford NobleICML 2021 · 14 次引用
  2. Backdoor Attacks on the DNN Interpretation SystemShihong Fang, Anna ChoromanskaAAAI 2022 · 22 次引用
  3. Improving Deep Learning Interpretability by Saliency Guided TrainingAya Abdelsalam Ismail, Héctor Corrada Bravo, Soheil FeiziNeurIPS 2021 · 121 次引用
  4. Explaining Black Box Predictions and Unveiling Data Artifacts through Influence FunctionsXiaochuang Han, Byron C. Wallace, Yulia TsvetkovACL 2020 · 91 次引用
  5. Interpreting the Second-Order Effects of Neurons in CLIPYossi Gandelsman, Alexei A. Efros, Jacob SteinhardtICLR 2025
黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖