ACL Findings2025
From Misleading Queries to Accurate Answers: A Three-Stage Fine-Tuning Method for LLMs
Guocong Li, Weize Liu, Yihang Wu, Ping Wang, Shuaihan Huang, Hongxia Xu, Jian Wu
摘要
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit excellent performance in natural language processing (NLP), but remain highly sensitive to the quality of input queries, especially when these queries contain misleading or inaccurate information. Existing methods focus on correcting the output, but they often overlook the potential of improving the ability of LLMs to detect and correct misleading content in the input itself. In this paper, we propose a novel three-stage fine-tuning method that enhances the ability of LLMs to detect and correct misleading information in the input, further improving response accuracy and reducing hallucinations. Specifically, the three stages include (1) training LLMs to identify misleading information, (2) training LLMs to correct the misleading information using built-in or external knowledge, and (3) training LLMs to generate accurate answers based on the corrected queries. To evaluate our method, we conducted experiments on three datasets for the hallucination detection task and the question answering (QA) task, as well as two datasets containing misleading information that we constructed. The experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly improves the accuracy and factuality of LLM responses, while also enhancing the ability to detect hallucinations and reducing the generation of hallucinations in the output, particularly when the query contains misleading information. 1
问 Lune
尽管问,回答会引用原文。
Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- Stable-RAG: Mitigating Retrieval-Permutation-Induced Hallucinations in Retrieval-Augmented GenerationQianchi Zhang, Hainan Zhang, Liang Pang, Hongwei Zheng 等ACL 2026 · 3 次引用
- Debate-of-Thoughts: Resolving Knowledge Conflicts in LLMs Through Internal DeliberationGuocong Li, Qirui Hu, Ping Wang, Guofeng Zhang 等ACL 2026
它引用的 Paper14
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni 等NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 次引用
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan 等NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 次引用
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 次引用
- Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language UnderstandingYixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal 等ACL 2020 · 602 次引用
- Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?Canyu Chen, Kai ShuICLR 2024 · 270 次引用
相关 Paper
- InterrogateLLM: Zero-Resource Hallucination Detection in LLM-Generated AnswersYakir Yehuda, Itzik Malkiel, Oren Barkan, Jonathan Weill 等ACL 2024
- The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language ModelsJunyi Li, Jie Chen, Ruiyang Ren, Xiaoxue Cheng 等ACL 2024 · 49 次引用
- Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?Zorik Gekhman, Gal Yona, Roee Aharoni, Matan Eyal 等EMNLP 2024 · 53 次引用
- ReFL: Reflective Feedback Learning for Hallucination Detection of Large Language ModelsCunhang Fan, Jun Zhang, Xue Zhang, Shuai Zhang 等ACL 2026
- DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language ModelsYung-Sung Chuang, Yujia Xie, Hongyin Luo, Yoon Kim 等ICLR 2024 · 354 次引用
