Lune

ICLR2025顶会

Conservative Contextual Bandits: Beyond Linear Representations

Rohan Deb, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh, Arindam Banerjee

2025年份
1顶会引用

摘要

Conservative Contextual Bandits (CCBs) address safety in sequential decision making by requiring that an agent's policy, along with minimizing regret, also satisfies a safety constraint: the performance is not worse than a baseline policy (e.g., the policy that the company has in production) by more than (1+α)(1+α) factor. Prior work developed UCB-style algorithms in the multi-armed [Wu et al., 2016] and contextual linear [Kazerouni et al., 2017] settings. However, in practice the cost of the arms is often a non-linear function, and therefore existing UCB algorithms are ineffective in such settings. In this paper, we consider CCBs beyond the linear case and develop two algorithms C−SquareCB\mathtt{C-SquareCB} and C−FastCB\mathtt{C-FastCB}, using Inverse Gap Weighting (IGW) based exploration and an online regression oracle. We show that the safety constraint is satisfied with high probability and that the regret of C−SquareCB\mathtt{C-SquareCB} is sub-linear in horizon TT, while the regret of C−FastCB\mathtt{C-FastCB} is first-order and is sub-linear in L∗L^*, the cumulative loss of the optimal policy. Subsequently, we use a neural network for function approximation and online gradient descent as the regression oracle to provide O~(KT+K/α)\tilde{O}(\sqrt{KT} + K/α) and O~(KL∗+K(1+1/α))\tilde{O}(\sqrt{KL^*} + K (1 + 1/α)) regret bounds, respectively. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our algorithms on real-world data and show that they significantly outperform the existing baseline while maintaining the performance guarantee.

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper1

问问它们各自怎么用它

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖