ACL Findings2025
DynaCode: A Dynamic Complexity-Aware Code Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Code Generation
Wenhao Hu, Jinhao Duan, Chunchen Wei, Li Zhang, Yue Zhang, Kaidi Xu
摘要
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has significantly improved their performance in code generation tasks. However, existing code benchmarks remain static, consisting of fixed datasets with predefined problems. This makes them vulnerable to memorization during training, where LLMs recall specific test cases instead of generalizing to new problems, leading to data contamination and unreliable evaluation results. To address these issues, we introduce DynaCode, a dynamic, complexity-aware benchmark that overcomes the limitations of static datasets. Dyna-Code evaluates LLMs systematically using a complexity-aware metric, incorporating both code complexity and call-graph structures. Dy-naCode achieves large-scale diversity, generating up to 189 million unique nested code problems across four distinct levels of code complexity, referred to as units, and 16 types of call graphs. Results on 12 latest LLMs show an average performance drop of 16.8% to 45.7% compared to MBPP+, a static code generation benchmark, with performance progressively decreasing as complexity increases. This demonstrates DynaCode's ability to effectively differentiate LLMs. Additionally, by leveraging call graphs, we gain insights into LLM behavior, particularly their preference for handling subfunction interactions within nested code. Our benchmark and evaluation code are available at https://github.com/HWH-2000/DynaCode.
问 Lune
尽管问,回答会引用原文。
Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。
引用它的顶会 Paper7
- Afterburner: Reinforcement Learning Facilitates Self-Improving Code Efficiency OptimizationMingzhe Du, Anh Tuan Luu, Yue Liu, Yuhao Qing 等NeurIPS 2025 · 18 次引用
- DSCodeBench: A Realistic Benchmark for Data Science Code GenerationShuyin Ouyang, Dong Huang, Jingwen Guo, Zeyu Sun 等AAAI 2026 · 10 次引用
- Local Success Does Not Compose: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Compositional Formal VerificationXu Xu, Xin Li, Xingwei Qu, Jie Fu 等ICLR 2026 · 9 次引用
- Gistify: Codebase-Level Understanding via Runtime ExecutionHyunji Lee, Minseon Kim, Chinmay Singh, Matheus Pereira 等ICLR 2026 · 4 次引用
- LLMulator: Generalizable Cost Modeling for Dataflow Accelerators with Input-Adaptive Control FlowKaiyan Chang, Wenlong Zhu, Shengwen Liang, Huawei Li 等MICRO 2025 · 1 次引用
它引用的 Paper13
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 次引用
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao 等ICLR 2024 · 2,082 次引用
- WizardLM: Empowering Large Pre-Trained Language Models to Follow Complex InstructionsCan Xu, Qingfeng Sun, Kai Zheng, Xiubo Geng 等ICLR 2024 · 1,206 次引用
- CRUXEval: A Benchmark for Code Reasoning, Understanding and ExecutionAlex Gu, Baptiste Rozière, Hugh James Leather, Armando Solar-Lezama 等ICML 2024 · 270 次引用
- CoderEval: A Benchmark of Pragmatic Code Generation with Generative Pre-trained ModelsHao Yu, Bo Shen, Dezhi Ran, Jiaxin Zhang 等ICSE 2024 · 107 次引用
相关 Paper
- AutoCodeBench: Large Language Models are Automatic Code Benchmark GeneratorsChangzhi Zhou, Ao Liu, Yuchi Deng, Zhiying Zeng 等ICLR 2026 · 27 次引用
- DyCodeEval: Dynamic Benchmarking of Reasoning Capabilities in Code Large Language Models Under Data ContaminationSimin Chen, Pranav Pusarla, Baishakhi RayICML 2025
- DOMAINEVAL: An Auto-Constructed Benchmark for Multi-Domain Code GenerationQiming Zhu, Jialun Cao, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin 等AAAI 2025 · 25 次引用
- Top General Performance = Top Domain Performance? DomainCodeBench: A Multi-domain Code Generation BenchmarkDewu Zheng, Yanlin Wang, Ensheng Shi, Xilin Liu 等ICSE 2026
- DARG: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models via Adaptive Reasoning GraphZhehao Zhang, Jiaao Chen, Diyi YangNeurIPS 2024 · 42 次引用
