ACL Findings2026
LQM: Linguistically Motivated Multidimensional Quality Metrics for Machine Translation
Samar Mohamed Magdy, Fakhraddin Alwajih, Abdellah El Mekki, Wesam El-Sayed, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed
摘要
Existing MT evaluation frameworks, including automatic metrics and human evaluation schemes such as Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM), are largely language-agnostic. However, they often fail to capture dialect-and culture-specific errors in diglossic languages (e.g., Arabic), where translation failures stem from mismatches in language variety, content coverage, and pragmatic appropriateness rather than surface form alone. We introduce LQM: Linguistically Motivated Multidimensional Quality Metrics for MT. LQM is a hierarchical error taxonomy for diagnosing MT errors through six linguistically grounded levels: sociolinguistics, pragmatics, semantics, morphosyntax, orthography, and graphetics * Equal contribution (Figure 1). We construct a bidirectional parallel corpus of 3,850 sentences (550 per variety) spanning seven Arabic dialects (Egyptian, Emirati, Jordanian, Mauritanian, Moroccan, Palestinian, and Yemeni), derived from conversational, culturally rich content. We evaluate six LLMs in a zero-shot setting and conduct expert span-level human annotation using LQM, producing 6,113 labeled error spans across 3,495 unique erroneous sentences, along with severity-weighted quality scores. We complement this analysis with an automatic metric (spBLEU). Though validated here on Arabic, LQM is a language-agnostic framework designed to be easily applied to or adapted for other languages. LQM annotated errors data, prompts, and annotation guidelines are publicly available at https://github.com/ UBC-NLP/LQM_MT.
问 Lune
尽管问,回答会引用原文。
Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。
它引用的 Paper8
- Benchmarking Machine Translation with Cultural AwarenessBinwei Yao, Ming Jiang, Tara Bobinac, Diyi Yang 等EMNLP Findings 2024 · 48 次引用
- Leveraging GPT-4 for Automatic Translation Post-EditingVikas Raunak, Amr Sharaf, Yiren Wang, Hany Hassan Awadalla 等EMNLP Findings 2023 · 45 次引用
- DRT: Deep Reasoning Translation via Long Chain-of-ThoughtJiaan Wang, Fandong Meng, Yunlong Liang, Jie ZhouACL Findings 2025 · 10 次引用
- MT-R1-Zero: Advancing LLM-based Machine Translation via R1-Zero-like Reinforcement LearningZhaopeng Feng, Shaosheng Cao, Jiahan Ren, Jiayuan Su 等EMNLP Findings 2025 · 9 次引用
- Are Large Reasoning Models Good Translation Evaluators? Analysis and Performance BoostRunzhe Zhan, Zhihong Huang, Xinyi Yang, Lidia S. Chao 等NeurIPS 2025 · 6 次引用
相关 Paper
- HiMATE: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Machine Translation EvaluationShijie Zhang, Renhao Li, Songsheng Wang, Philipp Koehn 等EMNLP Findings 2025 · 2 次引用
- Enhancing Human Evaluation in Machine Translation with Comparative JudgementYixiao Song, Parker Riley, Daniel Deutsch, Markus FreitagACL 2025 · 2 次引用
- AL-QASIDA: Analyzing LLM Quality and Accuracy Systematically in Dialectal ArabicNathaniel Romney Robinson, Shahd Abdelmoneim, Kelly Marchisio, Sebastian RuderACL Findings 2025 · 2 次引用
- Error Analysis of Multilingual Language Models in Machine Translation: A Case Study of English-Amharic TranslationHizkiel Alemayehu, Hamada M. Zahera, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga NgomoEMNLP 2024 · 1 次引用
- DEMETR: Diagnosing Evaluation Metrics for TranslationMarzena Karpinska, Nishant Raj, Katherine Thai, Yixiao Song 等EMNLP 2022 · 18 次引用
