EMNLP Findings2024
ProSA: Assessing and Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity of LLMs
Jingming Zhuo, Songyang Zhang, Xinyu Fang, Haodong Duan, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen
摘要
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across various tasks, but their performance is highly sensitive to the prompts utilized. This variability poses challenges for accurate assessment and user satisfaction. Current research frequently overlooks instance-level prompt variations and their implications on subjective evaluations. To address these shortcomings, we introduce ProSA, a framework designed to evaluate and comprehend prompt sensitivity in LLMs. ProSA incorporates a novel sensitivity metric, PromptSensiScore, and leverages decoding confidence to elucidate underlying mechanisms. Our extensive study, spanning multiple tasks, uncovers that prompt sensitivity fluctuates across datasets and models, with larger models exhibiting enhanced robustness. We observe that few-shot examples can alleviate this sensitivity issue, and subjective evaluations are also susceptible to prompt sensitivities, particularly in complex, reasoningoriented tasks. Furthermore, our findings indicate that higher model confidence correlates with increased prompt robustness. We believe this work will serve as a helpful tool in studying prompt sensitivity of LLMs. The project is released at: https://github.com/ open-compass/ProSA.
问 Lune
尽管问,回答会引用原文。
Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。
引用它的顶会 Paper18
- Understanding the Prompt SensitivityYang Liu, Chenhui ChuACL 2026 · 192 次引用
- Quantifying and Improving the Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Against Spurious Features in Grounding DataShiping Yang, Jie Wu, Wenbiao Ding, Ning Wu 等ACL 2026 · 9 次引用
- RAGTrace: Understanding and Refining Retrieval-Generation Dynamics in Retrieval-Augmented GenerationSizhe Cheng, Jiaping Li, Huanchen Wang, Yuxin MaUIST 2025 · 6 次引用
- Inertia in Moral and Value Judgments of Large Language ModelsBruce W. Lee, Yeongheon Lee, Hyunsoo ChoACL 2026 · 5 次引用
- Can we trust LLM Self-Explanations for Entity Resolution?Tommaso Teofili, Donatella Firmani, Nick Koudas, Paolo Merialdo 等VLDB 2026 · 2 次引用
它引用的 Paper3
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger 等ICLR 2020 · 8,443 次引用
- Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingMelanie Sclar, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov, Alane SuhrICLR 2024 · 682 次引用
- LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation DatasetLianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Tianle Li 等ICLR 2024 · 419 次引用
相关 Paper
- POSIX: A Prompt Sensitivity Index For Large Language ModelsAnwoy Chatterjee, H. S. V. N. S. Kowndinya Renduchintala, Sumit Bhatia, Tanmoy ChakrabortyEMNLP Findings 2024 · 36 次引用
- Evaluating and Explaining Prompt Sensitivity of LLMs Using InteractionsRuiyang Qin, Qingzhuo Wang, Tian Wang, Zhihua Wei 等ICML 2026 · 1 次引用
- DOVE: A Large-Scale Multi-Dimensional Predictions Dataset Towards Meaningful LLM EvaluationEliya Habba, Ofir Arviv, Itay Itzhak, Yotam Perlitz 等ACL Findings 2025
- Efficient multi-prompt evaluation of LLMsFelipe Maia Polo, Ronald Xu, Lucas Weber, Mírian Silva 等NeurIPS 2024 · 93 次引用
- AXCEL: Automated eXplainable Consistency Evaluation using LLMsP. Aditya Sreekar, Sahil Verma, Suransh Chopra, Abhishek Persad 等EMNLP Findings 2024 · 5 次引用
