EMNLP Findings2024
PaCoST: Paired Confidence Significance Testing for Benchmark Contamination Detection in Large Language Models
Huixuan Zhang, Yun Lin, Xiaojun Wan
摘要
Large language models (LLMs) are known to be trained on vast amounts of data, which may unintentionally or intentionally include data from commonly used benchmarks. This inclusion can lead to cheatingly high scores on model leaderboards, yet result in disappointing performance in real-world applications. To address this benchmark contamination problem, we first propose a set of requirements that practical contamination detection methods should follow. Following these proposed requirements, we introduce PaCoST, a Paired Confidence Significance Testing to effectively detect benchmark contamination in LLMs. Our method constructs a counterpart for each piece of data with the same distribution, and performs statistical analysis of the corresponding confidence to test whether the model is significantly more confident under the original benchmark. We validate the effectiveness of PaCoST and apply it on popular open-source models and benchmarks. We find that almost all models and benchmarks we tested are suspected contaminated more or less. We finally call for new LLM evaluation methods. 1
问 Lune
尽管问,回答会引用原文。
Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。
引用它的顶会 Paper5
- In Benchmarks We Trust ... Or Not?Ine Gevers, Victor De Marez, Jens Van Nooten, Jens Lemmens 等EMNLP 2025 · 1 次引用
- How Contaminated Is Your Benchmark? Measuring Dataset Leakage in Large Language Models with Kernel DivergenceHyeong Kyu Choi, Maxim Khanov, Hongxin Wei, Yixuan LiICML 2025
- STAMP Your Content: Proving Dataset Membership via Watermarked RephrasingsSaksham Rastogi, Pratyush Maini, Danish PruthiICML 2025
- MMBench-Live: A Continuously Evolving Benchmark for Multimodal ModelsYuanzhi Liu, Shousheng Zhao, Bo Zhou, Kongming Liang 等ICML 2026
- DyePack: Provably Flagging Test Set Contamination in LLMs Using BackdoorsYize Cheng, Wenxiao Wang, Mazda Moayeri, Soheil FeiziEMNLP 2025
它引用的 Paper21
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 次引用
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger 等ICLR 2020 · 8,443 次引用
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou 等ICLR 2021 · 7,905 次引用
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 次引用
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu 等ICLR 2022 · 4,966 次引用
相关 Paper
- ConStat: Performance-Based Contamination Detection in Large Language ModelsJasper Dekoninck, Mark Niklas Müller, Martin T. VechevNeurIPS 2024 · 40 次引用
- NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each BenchmarkOscar Sainz, Jon Ander Campos, Iker García-Ferrero, Julen Etxaniz 等EMNLP Findings 2023 · 85 次引用
- An Open-Source Data Contamination Report for Large Language ModelsYucheng Li, Yunhao Guo, Frank Guerin, Chenghua LinEMNLP Findings 2024 · 19 次引用
- Time Travel in LLMs: Tracing Data Contamination in Large Language ModelsShahriar Golchin, Mihai SurdeanuICLR 2024 · 165 次引用
- Detecting Data Contamination in LLMs via In-Context LearningMichal Zawalski, Meriem Boubdir, Klaudia Balazy, Besmira Nushi 等ICLR 2026 · 8 次引用
