Lune

ACL Findings2026

Prompting Test-Time Scaling Is A Strong LLM Reasoning Data Augmentation

Sondos Mahmoud Bsharat, Zhiqiang Shen

摘要

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning when guided by chain-of-thought exemplars, yet collecting large, high-quality reasoning datasets remains laborious and resource-intensive. We introduce Prompting Test-Time Scaling (P-TTS), a prompt-space data augmentation framework for enhancing LLM reasoning via fine-tuning. In P-TTS, scaling refers to systematic expansion of the prompt space during offline teacher-data generation, not to increased inference-time compute for the deployed student. Rather than collecting thousands of examples, P-TTS starts from a small pool of 90 manually selected reasoning instances and applies principled instruction templates and paraphrased prompt variants to elicit diverse reasoning trajectories from a teacher model, producing a compact synthetic training set. We fine-tune Qwen-2.5 models of multiple sizes on the resulting data. On reasoning benchmarks including AIME25, MATH500, and GPQA-Diamond, P-TTS consistently improves accuracy over competitive small-data baselines such as S1 and S1.1 (1Kshot), with the largest gains on AIME25 while remaining strong on MATH500 and GPQA-Diamond. P-TTS also improves generalization on out-of-domain reasoning evaluations. Ablations show that exemplar diversity and promptspace scaling are critical drivers of improvement, suggesting that prompt scaling explores the latent space of reasoning patterns, amplifying LLM problem-solving with minimal annotation overhead. P-TTS offers a practical, low-cost way to elicit strong LLM reasoning in resource-constrained or rapidly evolving domains. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/VILA-Lab/PTTS.

问 Lune

尽管问,回答会引用原文。

Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。

可以从这些问题问起

Lune 的依据

全文 · 引用它的 1 篇顶会 Paper · 相关的 Paper

获取答案

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper1

  1. GIFT: Bootstrapping Image-to-CAD Program Synthesis via Geometric FeedbackGiorgio Giannone, Anna Doris, Amin Nobari, Kai Xu 等ICML 2026 · 3 次引用

它引用的 Paper12

  1. Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 次引用
  2. The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes 等ICLR 2020 · 4,112 次引用
  3. Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le 等ICLR 2023 · 681 次引用
  4. MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language ModelsLonghui Yu, Weisen Jiang, Han Shi, Jincheng Yu 等ICLR 2024 · 637 次引用
  5. OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning ModelsEtash Kumar Guha, Ryan Marten, Sedrick Keh, Negin Raoof 等ICLR 2026 · 235 次引用

相关 Paper

  1. Scaling Prompt Synthesis for Large Language Model ReasoningXueliang Zhao, Wei Wu, Jian Guan, Zhuocheng Gong 等ICML 2026 · 5 次引用
  2. Learning Diverse Responses with Prefix-Conditioned Supervised Fine-TuningZhiyuan Fan, Guanqiao Chen, Yanyi Huang, Mingkuan Zhao 等ACL 2026
  3. Large Language Models Can Self-ImproveJiaxin Huang, Shixiang Gu, Le Hou, Yuexin Wu 等EMNLP 2023 · 184 次引用
  4. Scaling Code-Assisted Chain-of-Thoughts and Instructions for Model ReasoningHonglin Lin, Qizhi Pei, Zhuoshi Pan, Yu Li 等NeurIPS 2025 · 12 次引用
  5. Large Language Models Are Reasoning TeachersNamgyu Ho, Laura Schmid, Se-Young YunACL 2023 · 102 次引用
黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖