NRGPT: An Energy-based Alternative for GPT
Nima Dehmamy, Benjamin Hoover, Bishwajit Saha, Leo Kozachkov, Jean-Jacques Slotine, Dmitry Krotov
Abstract
Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) architectures are the most popular design for language modeling. Energy-based modeling is a different paradigm that views inference as a dynamical process operating on an energy landscape. We propose a minimal modification of the GPT setting to unify it with the EBM framework. The inference step of our model, which we call eNeRgy-GPT (NRGPT), is conceptualized as an exploration of the tokens on the energy landscape. We prove, and verify empirically, that under certain circumstances this exploration becomes gradient descent, although they don't necessarily lead to the best performing models. We demonstrate that our model performs well for simple language (Shakespeare dataset), algebraic ListOPS tasks, and richer settings such as OpenWebText language modeling. We also observe that our models may be more resistant to overfitting, doing so only during very long training. Transformers represent a dominant paradigm in autoregressive language modeling (Vaswani et al., 2017) . In a typical setting, a sequence of tokens describing a text is passed through several transformer layers and mapped onto a new sequence, which is a copy of the original one shifted by one token and appended by the token that follows the initial sequence. At training time, this network is trained through self-supervised training, and at inference time the network is used for next token prediction. This is the standard Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) setting, which is the first step in Large Language Model (LLM) design (Radford et al., 2018) .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f9b75263-ed28-40c8-b92c-b94d37112d94Builds on11
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Transformers Learn In-Context by Gradient DescentJohannes von Oswald, Eyvind Niklasson, Ettore Randazzo, João Sacramento et al.ICML 2023 · 729 citations
- A Survey on In-context LearningQingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng et al.EMNLP 2024 · 479 citations
- Transformers learn to implement preconditioned gradient descent for in-context learningKwangjun Ahn, Xiang Cheng, Hadi Daneshmand, Suvrit SraNeurIPS 2023 · 324 citations
Related papers
- GraphGPT: Generative Pre-trained Graph Eulerian TransformerQifang Zhao, Weidong Ren, Tianyu Li, Hong Liu et al.ICML 2025
- Energy-Based Diffusion Language Models for Text GenerationMinkai Xu, Tomas Geffner, Karsten Kreis, Weili Nie et al.ICLR 2025
- Residual Energy-Based Models for Text GenerationYuntian Deng, Anton Bakhtin, Myle Ott, Arthur Szlam et al.ICLR 2020 · 147 citations
- Autoregressive Language Models are Secretly Energy-Based Models: Insights into the Lookahead Capabilities of Next-Token PredictionMathieu Blondel, Michael Sander, Germain Vivier-Ardisson, Tianlin Liu et al.ICML 2026 · 8 citations
- Transformers from an Optimization PerspectiveYongyi Yang, Zengfeng Huang, David P. WipfNeurIPS 2022 · 44 citations
