Lune

NeurIPS2025Top-tier venue

What Do Latent Action Models Actually Learn?

Chuheng Zhang, Tim Pearce, Pushi Zhang, Kaixin Wang, Xiaoyu Chen, Wei Shen, Li Zhao, Jiang Bian

2025Year
35Citations
8Top-tier citations

Abstract

Latent action models (LAMs) aim to learn action-relevant changes from unlabeled videos by compressing changes between frames as latents. However, differences between video frames can be caused by controllable changes as well as exogenous noise, leading to an important concern -do latents capture the changes caused by actions or irrelevant noise? This paper studies this issue analytically, presenting a linear model that encapsulates the essence of LAM learning, while being tractable. This provides several insights, including connections between LAM and principal component analysis (PCA), desiderata of the data-generating policy, and justification of strategies to encourage learning controllable changes using data augmentation, data cleaning, and auxiliary action-prediction. These findings are validated through numerical simulations, as well as experiments in more realistic settings. This investigation is the first to rigorously investigate how the structure of observations, actions, and noise influence LAM learning.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext eb5452bf-5603-48d8-a93a-19271af2f98a

Cited by top-tier papers8

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on15

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines