Lune

CCS2025Top-tier venue

CHaRM: Checkpointed and Hashed Counters for Flexible and Efficient Rowhammer Mitigation

Ali Hajiabadi, Michele Marazzi, Kaveh Razavi

2025Year
1Top-tier citations

Abstract

Despite efforts by DRAM vendors to mitigate Rowhammer, it is still a potent attack vector. CPU vendors are reluctant to deploy deterministic mitigations against Rowhammer due to the high cost that needs to be paid for the most vulnerable DRAM device, even though an average DRAM device is considerably less vulnerable. The main reason for this high cost is the need to track an increasing number of aggressor rows with the worsening Rowhammer threshold. Our proposed in-CPU mitigation, called CHaRM, breaks this dependency by efficiently mapping a large number of rows to a fixed number of hashed counters. Since multiple rows are now mapped to a limited number of counters, collisions can occur. To avoid excessive mitigative refreshes upon collisions, CHaRM deploys a checkpointing mechanism that saves the state of rows evicted from the table. When a row is activated again, CHaRM restores its checkpointed value and resumes tracking. Our evaluation shows that CHaRM incurs negligible slowdown, below 1% across all Rowhammer thresholds, while improving area, power, and energy by 3.8x, 4.4x, and 8.2x, respectively, for Rowhammer threshold of 1K compared to the state of the art.

Ask about this paper

Ask your agent about it.

Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Lunesearch_papers

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers get e86fc6bf-aa47-4e29-ade1-8ba7d8d2f07a

Cited by top-tier papers1

Ask how each one uses it

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines