SmoothHess: ReLU Network Feature Interactions via Stein's Lemma
Max Torop, Aria Masoomi, Davin Hill, Kivanç Köse, Stratis Ioannidis, Jennifer G. Dy
Abstract
Several recent methods for interpretability model feature interactions by looking at the Hessian of a neural network. This poses a challenge for ReLU networks, which are piecewise-linear and thus have a zero Hessian almost everywhere. We propose SmoothHess, a method of estimating second-order interactions through Stein's Lemma. In particular, we estimate the Hessian of the network convolved with a Gaussian through an efficient sampling algorithm, requiring only network gradient calls. SmoothHess is applied post-hoc, requires no modifications to the ReLU network architecture, and the extent of smoothing can be controlled explicitly. We provide a non-asymptotic bound on the sample complexity of our estimation procedure. We validate the superior ability of SmoothHess to capture interactions on benchmark datasets and a real-world medical spirometry dataset. Related Work Feature Importance and First-Order Methods: Methods that quantify feature importance fall into two categories: (i) perturbation-based methods (e.g., [53, 66, 17] ), which evaluate the change in model outputs with respect to perturbed inputs, and (ii) gradient-based methods (e.g., [72, 76, 81] ), which leverage the natural interpretation of the gradient as infinitesimally local importance for a given sample. Most relevant to our work are gradient-based approaches. The saliency map, as defined in [72] , is simply the gradient of model output with respect to the input. Several variants are developed to address the shortcomings of the saliency maps. SmoothGrad [76] was developed * https://github.com/MaxTorop/SmoothHess * All ReLU network outputs, internal neurons, and SoftMax probabilities are Lipschitz continuous [29, 26] .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e647a6ae-b080-44fa-9bc4-9bdf41263699Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on14
- Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in ExplainabilityDylan Slack, Anna Hilgard, Sameer Singh, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2021 · 240 citations
- The Shapley Taylor Interaction IndexMukund Sundararajan, Kedar Dhamdhere, Ashish AgarwalICML 2020 · 199 citations
- How does This Interaction Affect Me? Interpretable Attribution for Feature InteractionsMichael Tsang, Sirisha Rambhatla, Yan LiuNeurIPS 2020 · 109 citations
- Towards the Unification and Robustness of Perturbation and Gradient Based ExplanationsSushant Agarwal, Shahin Jabbari, Chirag Agarwal, Sohini Upadhyay et al.ICML 2021 · 71 citations
- Feature Interaction Interpretability: A Case for Explaining Ad-Recommendation Systems via Neural Interaction DetectionMichael Tsang, Dehua Cheng, Hanpeng Liu, Xue Feng et al.ICLR 2020 · 71 citations
Related papers
- Neglected Hessian component explains mysteries in sharpness regularizationYann N. Dauphin, Atish Agarwala, Hossein MobahiNeurIPS 2024 · 16 citations
- FIMAP: Feature Importance by Minimal Adversarial PerturbationMatt Chapman-Rounds, Umang Bhatt, Erik Pazos, Marc-Andre Schulz et al.AAAI 2021 · 14 citations
- On the Complexity-Faithfulness Trade-Off of Gradient-Based ExplanationsAmir Mehrpanah, Matteo Gamba, Kevin Smith, Hossein AzizpourICCV 2025 · 2 citations
- H-Sets: Hessian-Guided Discovery of Set-Level Feature Interactions in Image ClassifiersAyushi Mehrotra, Dipkamal Bhusal, Michael Clifford, Nidhi RastogiCVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- Explaining Local, Global, And Higher-Order Interactions In Deep LearningSamuel Lerman, Charles Venuto, Henry A. Kautz, Chenliang XuICCV 2021 · 13 citations
