Capability Instruction Tuning
Yi-Kai Zhang, De-Chuan Zhan, Han-Jia Ye
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated humanlike instruction-following abilities, particularly those exceeding 100 billion parameters. The combined capability of some smaller, resource-friendly LLMs can address most of the instructions that larger LLMs excel at. In this work, we explore how to route the best-performing LLM for each instruction to achieve better overall performance. We develop a new paradigm, constructing capability instructions with model capability representation, user instruction, and performance inquiry prompts to assess the performance. To learn from capability instructions, we introduce a new end-to-end framework called Model Selection with Aptitude Test (MODEL-SAT), which generates positive and negative samples based on what different models perform well or struggle with. MODEL-SAT uses a model capability encoder that extends its model representation to a lightweight LLM. Our experiments show that MODEL-SAT understands the performance dimensions of candidate models and provides the probabilities of their capability to handle various instructions. Additionally, during deployment, a new model can quickly infer its aptitude test results across 50 tasks, each with 20 shots. MODEL-SAT performs state-of-the-art model routing without candidate inference and in real-world new model-released scenarios. The code is available at https://github.com/Now-Join-Us/CIT-LLM-Routing .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dd46789f-be39-46b5-a571-4e7e815b4dd9Cited by top-tier papers8
- Constructive Specification for Plug-and-Play Learnware AgentsJian-Dong Liu, Zi-Chen Zhao, Hao Sun, Lin-Xing Wu et al.KDD 2026 · 3 citations
- : A Generalist Value Model for Any Policy at State ZeroYi-Kai Zhang, Zhiyuan Yao, Hongyan Hao, Yueqing Sun et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- SAME: Stabilized Mixture-of-Experts for Multimodal Continual Instruction TuningZhen-Hao Xie Xie, Jun-Tao Tang, Yu-Cheng Shi, Han-Jia Ye et al.ICML 2026
- From Selection to Refinement: Iterative Optimization for Instruction DataHang Hu, Ziyan Liu, Rujie Wen, Ruihui Hou et al.ACL 2026
- Adaptive-Learngene: Continual Expansion and Task-Aware Selection of Learngenes for Dynamic EnvironmentsShuxia Lin, Qiufeng Wang, Chang Liu, Xu Yang et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on14
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- Hybrid LLM: Cost-Efficient and Quality-Aware Query RoutingDujian Ding, Ankur Mallick, Chi Wang, Robert Sim et al.ICLR 2024 · 282 citations
- LEEP: A New Measure to Evaluate Transferability of Learned RepresentationsCuong V. Nguyen, Tal Hassner, Matthias W. Seeger, Cédric ArchambeauICML 2020 · 279 citations
Related papers
- IRT-Router: Effective and Interpretable Multi-LLM Routing via Item Response TheoryWei Song, Zhenya Huang, Cheng Cheng, Weibo Gao et al.ACL 2025 · 20 citations
- Let the LLM Stick to Its Strengths: Learning to Route Economical LLMYi-Kai Zhang, Shiyin Lu, Qingguo Chen, Weihua Luo et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Lookahead Routing for Large Language ModelsCanbin Huang, Tianyuan Shi, Yuhua Zhu, Ruijun Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- Specializing Smaller Language Models towards Multi-Step ReasoningYao Fu, Hao Peng, Litu Ou, Ashish Sabharwal et al.ICML 2023 · 347 citations
- EmbedLLM: Learning Compact Representations of Large Language ModelsRichard Zhuang, Tianhao Wu, Zhaojin Wen, Andrew Li et al.ICLR 2025
