Mitigating Risk while Complying with Data Retention Laws
Luis Vargas, Gyan Hazarika, Rachel Culpepper, Kevin R. B. Butler, Thomas Shrimpton, Doug Szajda, Patrick Traynor
Abstract
Data breaches represent a signicant threat to organizations. While the general problem of protecting data has received much attention, one large (and growing) class has not -data that must be kept due to mandatory retention laws. Such data is often of little use to an organization, is rarely accessed, and represents a signicant potential liability, yet cannot be discarded. Protecting such data entails an unusual combination of practical constraints (such as providing verication to a party that may be unknown) and thus requires functionality that is not well addressed by traditional cryptographic primitives. We propose to mitigate the risk to such data through a new system called Dragchute, which creates a time window during which locked data cannot be accessed by anyone. Based on a veriable non-interactive, non-parallelizable, time-delay key escrow mechanism, Dragchute is novel in that it requires that no cryptographic material capable of providing early access to the data be retained, yet provides verication for multiple properties. We dene a base construction for Dragchute, show possible extensions that help meet additional verication requirements, and characterize its performance. Our results show that Dragchute systems oer veriable, customizable, computational protection against data exposure for encryption costs similar to traditional methods (e.g., less than 6% overhead compared to AEAD). We thus show that Dragchute systems provide a critical new means for protecting data that must be retained long term due to mandatory retention laws. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Cryptography; Database and storage security;
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext da735e9f-5ed0-47b8-adb9-5cdd1dd077f1Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on3
- Ligero: Lightweight Sublinear Arguments Without a Trusted SetupScott Ames, Carmit Hazay, Yuval Ishai, Muthuramakrishnan VenkitasubramaniamCCS 2017 · 338 citations
- Zero-Knowledge Contingent Payments Revisited: Attacks and Payments for ServicesMatteo Campanelli, Rosario Gennaro, Steven Goldfeder, Luca NizzardoCCS 2017 · 170 citations
- Egalitarian ComputingAlex Biryukov, Dmitry KhovratovichUSENIX Security 2016 · 26 citations
Related papers
- Lawful Device Access without Mass Surveillance Risk: A Technical Design DiscussionStefan SavageCCS 2018 · 22 citations
- Timelock Drive: Isolated Time-Based Defense for Storage SystemsJonah Rosenblum, Juechu Dong, Peter Chen, Satish NarayanasamyOSDI 2026
- HARDLOG: Practical Tamper-Proof System Auditing Using a Novel Audit DeviceAdil Ahmad, Sangho Lee, Marcus PeinadoS&P 2022 · 46 citations
- INVISILINE: Invisible Plausibly-Deniable StorageSandeep Kiran Pinjala, Bogdan Carbunar, Anrin Chakraborti, Radu SionS&P 2024 · 3 citations
- Anamorphic Encryption: Private Communication Against a DictatorGiuseppe Persiano, Duong Hieu Phan, Moti YungEUROCRYPT 2022 · 45 citations
