Fluent Alignment with Disfluent Judges: Post-training for lower-resource languages
David Samuel, Lilja Øvrelid, Erik Velldal, Andrey Kutuzov
Abstract
We propose a post-training method for lower-resource languages that preserves the fluency of language models even when aligned by disfluent reward models. Preference optimization is now a well-researched topic, but previous work has mostly addressed models for English and Chinese. Lower-resource languages lack both datasets written by native speakers and instruction-tuned language models capable of generating fluent synthetic data. To address this, we focus on developing a fluent preference-aligned language model without any instruction-tuning data in the target language. Our approach uses an on-policy training method, which we compare with two common alternatives: supervised finetuning on machinetranslated data and multilingual finetuning. We conduct a case study on Norwegian Bokmål and evaluate fluency through native-speaker assessments. The results show that the on-policy aspect is crucial and outperforms the alternatives without relying on any hard-to-obtain data. Recent advances in reinforcement learning from AI feedback (RLAIF; Bai et al., 2022) offer a potential solution to this challenge. In on-policy reinforcement learning, the model learns from its own generated responses rather than from fixed datasets. This means we can potentially avoid exposing it to disfluent text altogether. The key insight is that a model that has learned fluent generation through extensive pretraining on native texts can maintain this fluency as long as it is never trained on unnatural examples during the alignment phase. 1 Fluency refers to the linguistic quality of text that makes it natural, grammatical, and easy to read. It should read as though written by a native speaker. It is independent of other qualities such as factual accuracy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on17
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI FeedbackHarrison Lee, Samrat Phatale, Hassan Mansoor, Thomas Mesnard et al.ICML 2024 · 598 citations
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li et al.ICML 2024 · 569 citations
- Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at ScaleAlexis Conneau, Kartikay Khandelwal, Naman Goyal, Vishrav Chaudhary et al.ACL 2020 · 539 citations
Related papers
- Preference-Oriented Supervised Fine-Tuning: Favoring Target Model over Aligned Large Language ModelsYuchen Fan, Yuzhong Hong, Qiushi Wang, Junwei Bao et al.AAAI 2025 · 7 citations
- Filtered Direct Preference OptimizationTetsuro Morimura, Mitsuki Sakamoto, Yuu Jinnai, Kenshi Abe et al.EMNLP 2024 · 4 citations
- Trajectory Balance with Asynchrony: Decoupling Exploration and Learning for Fast, Scalable LLM Post-TrainingBrian R. Bartoldson, Siddarth Venkatraman, James Diffenderfer, Moksh Jain et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 34 citations
- Using Human Feedback to Fine-tune Diffusion Models without Any Reward ModelKai Yang, Jian Tao, Jiafei Lyu, Chunjiang Ge et al.CVPR 2024 · 34 citations
- Asymmetric REINFORCE for off-Policy Reinforcement Learning: Balancing positive and negative rewardsCharles Arnal, Gaëtan Narozniak, Vivien Cabannes, Yunhao Tang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 30 citations
