Counting Subgraphs under Shuffle Differential Privacy
Juanru Fang, Ke Yi
Abstract
To understand the complex structures and relationships in graph data while safeguarding personal privacy, subgraph counting under differential privacy (DP) has received a lot of attention recently. The problem is particularly important in a distributed setting, where each node holds only its local neighboring information and the analyst is untrusted. In the literature, two DP models are tailored for this scenario, known as local DP and shuffle DP, whereas the latter is equipped with a trusted shuffler that random shuffles the messages before handing them to the analyst. Since the shuffler introduces no additional privacy risk, any local DP protocol automatically satisfies shuffle DP, and the key question is whether shuffle DP can offer any improvement, especially for utility. While positive results have been obtained for a number of basic problems, such as basic counting, frequency estimation, and distinct count, it still remains elusive if this is the case for any graph problem. In this paper, we advance the understanding of this question by presenting new shuffle DP protocols for counting various subgraphs, including triangles, 4cycles, and 3-hop paths, which improve upon the existing local DP and shuffle DP protocols, both asymptotically and concretely.
• Security and privacy → Database and storage security.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d6ba7929-4731-4797-abab-e89a471fb51aCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on13
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- Locally Differentially Private Analysis of Graph StatisticsJacob Imola, Takao Murakami, Kamalika ChaudhuriUSENIX Security 2021 · 139 citations
- Analyzing Subgraph Statistics from Extended Local Views with Decentralized Differential PrivacyHaipei Sun, Xiaokui Xiao, Issa Khalil, Yin Yang et al.CCS 2019 · 118 citations
- Private Counting from Anonymous Messages: Near-Optimal Accuracy with Vanishing Communication OverheadBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Rasmus PaghICML 2020 · 59 citations
- Differentially Private Aggregation in the Shuffle Model: Almost Central Accuracy in Almost a Single MessageBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Rasmus Pagh et al.ICML 2021 · 45 citations
Related papers
- Differentially Private Triangle and 4-Cycle Counting in the Shuffle ModelJacob Imola, Takao Murakami, Kamalika ChaudhuriCCS 2022 · 30 citations
- Acyclic Graph Pattern Counting under Local Differential PrivacyYihua Hu, Kuncan Wang, Wei DongSIGMOD 2026
- Collecting Triangle Counts with Edge Relationship Local Differential PrivacyYuhan Liu, Suyun Zhao, Yixuan Liu, Dan Zhao et al.ICDE 2022 · 28 citations
- RM2: Answer Counting Queries Efficiently under Shuffle Differential PrivacyQiyao Luo, Jianzhe Yu, Wei Dong, Quanqing Xu et al.SIGMOD 2025 · 3 citations
- Agent-based Substructure Counting under Local Differential PrivacyYuting Zhang, Kai Wang, Wei Ni, Ying Zhang et al.ACL 2026
